Live data from Hacker News

Twitter to Stop Counting Photos and Links in 140-Character Limit

bloomberg.com

151–160 of 196 posts

Re: Twitter to Stop Counting Photos and Links in 140-Character Limit

#151
post #113

Earlier quoted context omitted.

> Knowing strategies to avoid just nasty people Perhaps refrain from using childish insults like Gamer Gayers . Like attracts like.

Yow! That is fully an iPhone spelling fail. That was not in any way intended. Sorry about that!

Alternatively, it is fully a lack of proofreading before hitting reply fail :-)

Either way, yes, out of all the words to misspell, that one was quite unfortunate.

Re: Twitter to Stop Counting Photos and Links in 140-Character Limit

#152

I wonder what they will do once people start using http://the.links http://to.write.longer http://messages

Anyone wanting to bypass the 140 limit is already doing so using an image with text in it. And anyone who spams really long messages using URLs is going to see their followers count drop pretty rapidly.

Re: Twitter to Stop Counting Photos and Links in 140-Character Limit

#153
post #131

Earlier quoted context omitted.

oblig pointing out of incorrect oblig correction. network effect[0] is absolutely correct. edit: for the downvotes- [0] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Network_effect

parent made an edit from affect to effect, so I guess my recommendation was taken to heart :)

Fair point though, it's confusing. Can't you edit your post and remove the correction now that it's irrelevant? And then we can delete this entire unnecessary subthread :)

Re: Twitter to Stop Counting Photos and Links in 140-Character Limit

#154

The fact that it took this long for them to make such an obvious change speaks to how afraid they are (were?) to challenge core assumptions about the product.

Imo, it shows that, like many of us, they don't really understand why Twitter became so popular. That being the case, they don't know what they can and cannot safely change.

To me, Twitter works because many people prefer to read 100 headlines and know a little about everything, than reading just a big essay. Have a variety of views, rather than just one.

It is better for the reader, not so for the writer. Because of that, I do not understand why they focus so much on getting more writers (login) than readers (views).

Re: Twitter to Stop Counting Photos and Links in 140-Character Limit

#155
post #113

Earlier quoted context omitted.

> Knowing strategies to avoid just nasty people Perhaps refrain from using childish insults like Gamer Gayers . Like attracts like.

Yow! That is fully an iPhone spelling fail. That was not in any way intended. Sorry about that!

You could, and should, edit it.

Re: Twitter to Stop Counting Photos and Links in 140-Character Limit

#157

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Definitely twitter is entirely about who you follow. I tried it out early on, saw no value, and ignored it for a year or two, until a friend convinced me it has some value, and there are two uses I find. I follow several programmers (some internet famous, some merely who I've found from using a project they worked on or someone else's retweet), and through that, find it interesting to get a glimpse at what other peop…

What's the best strategy for avoiding harassment? I have a Twitter account, but very, very rarely use it. It's my biggest concern really. Knowing strategies to avoid just nasty people is the main issue I have with it. Like, if you go into Twitter and see that you have a whole bunch of Gamer Gayers targeting you (just an example, I can't see how I would be a target!) then I'd imagine having no Twitter would be prefera…

You're only likely to be 'targetted' by anyone if you post strong opinions on contentious topics. Of course, that doesn't mean you shouldn't, but you should be prepared to defend your views or ignore certain reactions. This is all just real life, after all.

Re: Twitter to Stop Counting Photos and Links in 140-Character Limit

#159
post #154

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Imo, it shows that, like many of us, they don't really understand why Twitter became so popular. That being the case, they don't know what they can and cannot safely change.

To me, Twitter works because many people prefer to read 100 headlines and know a little about everything, than reading just a big essay. Have a variety of views, rather than just one. It is better for the reader, not so for the writer. Because of that, I do not understand why they focus so much on getting more writers (login) than readers (views).

That's some assumption you make with no evidence. I'd sooner assume people like reading 100 people who agree with their inner biases or views.

Re: Twitter to Stop Counting Photos and Links in 140-Character Limit

#160

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Yow! That is fully an iPhone spelling fail. That was not in any way intended. Sorry about that!

You could, and should, edit it.

Actually he can't. HN has a time limit on edits, and it's expired for my post above, which means it's also expired for his.
Post reply on HN