Earlier quoted context omitted.
I tried for about a week. My complaints with it were the same i have with base Safari, but TP specifically worked fine. No unique issues despite using it as dev platform and a consumer browser.
I wish Safari would have the same incognito mode as Chrome's. Currently, tabs in the same incognito window do not share sessions so you have to log in again on every new tab.
WebKit is now 100% ES6 complete
31–40 of 119 posts
Re: WebKit is now 100% ES6 complete
#32Earlier quoted context omitted.
Module import/export syntax was in ES6, but the browser implementation has not yet been standardized.
Well, it's been standardized, but implementation work is still ongoing. Details at https://blog.whatwg.org/js-modules
Re: WebKit is now 100% ES6 complete
#33Re: WebKit is now 100% ES6 complete
#34Re: WebKit is now 100% ES6 complete
#35Anyone know of any good tooling to use transpiled code for older browsers and es6 for newer?
Re: WebKit is now 100% ES6 complete
#36The jump in support from Safari 9 (53%) to TP (99%, and then the last little bit from TP to current WebKit) is staggering.
Re: WebKit is now 100% ES6 complete
#37So, today I'm using babel to transpile my code to es5. Anyone know of any good tooling to use transpiled code for older browsers and es6 for newer?
You should continue to use the transpilers for some time though. It has been reported that many ES6 features run quite a bit faster as transpiled ES5 than natively as ES6.
Re: WebKit is now 100% ES6 complete
#38Re: WebKit is now 100% ES6 complete
#39So, today I'm using babel to transpile my code to es5. Anyone know of any good tooling to use transpiled code for older browsers and es6 for newer?
EDIT (for clarity): It'd be great to see similar query support to derive a "lowest common denominator" Babel preset for an intended ES generation vs. browser profile set.
[1] https://github.com/postcss/autoprefixer [2] https://github.com/ai/browserslist#queries
Re: WebKit is now 100% ES6 complete
#40Note that this doesn't include ES6 modules. The referenced kangax compatibility table doesn't cover modules, so the tweet is technically correct, but the headline here on HN is a bit misleading.