Live data from Hacker News

A former CIA spy has revealed his key role in the arrest of Nelson Mandela

thetimes.co.uk

201–210 of 297 posts

Re: A former CIA spy has revealed his key role in the arrest of Nelson Mandela

#201
post #198
post #81

Given the serious effort CIA puts into destabilising regions (Lets not forget the large amounts of sources who said people were being ferried and paid to go to Kiev when the Ukrainian uprising was occuring) it would not surprise me very much if they were also behind the Britain "exit" from Europe, since that would cause an economic collapse of the EU and would remove a super-power from play. I feel like a conspiracy…

" I mean it's economic suicide for britain to leave the EU, yet someone is plastering it all over the media and it's not the politicians. :\ " It's still their choice, to democratically decide to leave. Even though it potentially has bad/far-reaching consequences, doesn't mean we can discount the "democratic process" because of nefarious interference by clandestine agencies and media-manipulation.

I agree, but there is a very large media campaign that's pushing this, it's definitely somebodies agenda since every person with an economical mind has advised against it, even Cameron who was formerly against the EU before being in power.

Re: A former CIA spy has revealed his key role in the arrest of Nelson Mandela

#202

Earlier quoted context omitted.

The WTO and WTCs have similar names, but are not otherwise related to each other.

TIL. Thanks. So if it wasn't the headquarters for the WTO, what activity was taking place at the WTC?

The WTC belonged to the Port Authority -- an organization created by a compact between New York and New Jersey ( https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Port_Authority_of_New_York_and... ) that handles most of the public transportation between the two states. The Trade Center itself was just an office building complex, with the Port Authority one of the biggest tenants ( https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/World_Trade_Center_%281973%E2%... ).

Re: A former CIA spy has revealed his key role in the arrest of Nelson Mandela

#203

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Of course the government of SA didn't have to renounce violence, which is the way they dealt with any resistance. Violence, torture, intimidation. Refusal to negotiate. Of course we don't call the Apartheid government "terrorists" for these crimes. He was not a communist, but an African nationalist. This is something he has always maintained and was confirmed when he became president, the national economic policy was…

> Of course we don't call the Apartheid government "terrorists" for these crimes. Almost everyone agrees that the Apartheid government was horrible. Almost no one holds them up as a positive example. Conversely, almost everyone holds Mandela and his terrorist organization up as an example and as a hero despite them intentionally setting off bombs in civilian locations like shopping malls and restaurants.

Terrorism is sometimes the only weapon of those who fight against a much more powerful enemy. This doesn't mean that all terrorism is justifiable, but arresting your thought at words such as "terrorist" or "dictatorship" or "democracy" is silly. These are just arbitrary labels.

Re: A former CIA spy has revealed his key role in the arrest of Nelson Mandela

#204
post #158

Earlier quoted context omitted.

There isn't anything intrinsically wrong with communism as an ideal. There clearly is. Everywhere it has been tried, it led to at least poverty and usually genocide. Communism has been far, far worse than nazism or fascism and holding national socialism as some sort of valuable ideal untainted by the reality is unacceptable almost everywhere. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Black_Book_of_Communism

In practice yes, but not in theory, which is an important distinction. To use an analogy, genocide of Jews is an unacceptable ideal, you don't have to try it out to know its bad. In retrospect, no one thought the nazi's plan could have ended up working in a "good" way. Compare that to Lenin and the Bolsheviks, given communism as an ideal alone, it wasn't inherently flawed or "evil", it just turns out people are selfi…

> In practice yes, but not in theory, which is an important distinction.

Communism is an economic system that falls apart in practice because of greed. An economic system that fails to account for greed is not good, even in theory.

Re: A former CIA spy has revealed his key role in the arrest of Nelson Mandela

#205
post #98

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Is that like the congressional committee headed by and filled with people who don't believe in science? https://www.google.com/search?q=congress+committee+anti+scie... Why would you expect any other oversight committee in any other field be competent?

Well, they were elected by a majority who doesn't believe in science. That's why it's strange that most of the people who believe in majority rule are surprised when democratic elections result in such outcomes.

They don't believe in scientific authorities when it contradict their religious authorities and other deeply held beliefs?

Re: A former CIA spy has revealed his key role in the arrest of Nelson Mandela

#206

Earlier quoted context omitted.

You are clearly incompetent about the subject. The "ideal" of communism and the practice of communism are not two different things. Communism is practiced precisely the way it is theoretically intended to work. Communism is a cleptocratic system of ruling and exploiting the manual labour and natural resources of any given territory inhabited by unambitious masses that largely lack individualism. The core of the syste…

Are you sure that is how Marx described communism, as a cleptocratic system of ruling and exploiting... I mean, I don't remember reading that at all, just like I don't remember Ayn Rand describing libertarianism as a return feudalism where property rights rule out over the collective of the people. Are you sure Marx wrote that, or are you letting your own bias into your definition? For the record, I live in a communi…

Marx did not describe communism that way, obviously, but it should be equally obvious that his terrible ideas led directly to what happened. Communism isn't some great idea that flawed humans have repeatedly screwed up - it is a flawed idea whose outcome was easily predicted even by Marx's contemporaries.

Seen with the benefit of hindsight, Mikael Bakunin's criticism is most appropriate:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mikhail_Bakunin#Critique_of_Ma...

They [the Marxists] maintain that only a dictatorship—their dictatorship, of course—can create the will of the people, while our answer to this is: No dictatorship can have any other aim but that of self-perpetuation, and it can beget only slavery in the people tolerating it; freedom can be created only by freedom, that is, by a universal rebellion on the part of the people and free organization of the toiling masses from the bottom up.

For Bakunin, the fundamental contradiction is that for the Marxists, "anarchism or freedom is the aim, while the state and dictatorship is the means, and so, in order to free the masses, they have first to be enslaved."

Marx directly argued that communism should be implemented by violent revolution that would put in place a temporary "dictatorship of the proles", which is an absurd concept containing the seeds of its destruction.

Re: A former CIA spy has revealed his key role in the arrest of Nelson Mandela

#207
I would like to thank all the people who had a comment on this article, but did not post it. Truly, you improve the community with your silence. I'm aware of my own hypocrisy on this point, but logical consistency would prevent this sentiment from ever being expressed.

As it is, perhaps 5% of these comments know anything about what they are talking about. One of the biggest intellectual failings of the sort that frequents this place is mistaking being smart with being informed.

Re: A former CIA spy has revealed his key role in the arrest of Nelson Mandela

#208
It's kind of odd that the DailyMail and RussiaToday (RT) have more "info" than the linked article that's paywalled. Not necessarily a bigger "scoop" of the story, but they provided more info about the parties, backstory, pictures included. Honestly, I tried looking for a decent article after encountering the paywall, but most were just "rehashed" quotes and links to the TheTimes article, with absolutely nothing of substance added.

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-3591000/How-CIA-got-...

https://www.rt.com/usa/343096-cia-nelson-mandela-arrest/

Anyone have a decent article on this with more info and backstory?

Re: A former CIA spy has revealed his key role in the arrest of Nelson Mandela

#209
post #5

The CIA is the reason for most of the unstable regions and it's hard to understand how after messing with other places and making it worse for everybody but weapons manufacturers, they're still doing the same thing over and over. Previously it was the fight against Communism, now Islam, I wonder what it will be in 2020. Middle-east, Asia, South America, all are right to be very angry with the CIA, but turn it into a…

> CIA's policy is probably controlled by someone else, and that's where changes need to be made because I like to think they don't come up with the stuff on their own. Beyond you liking to think that, what evidence do you have that the CIA's policy is controlled by anyone other than the CIA's Deputy Director who commands internal operations, and its Director, who reports to the director of National Intelligence as we…

[deleted]

Re: A former CIA spy has revealed his key role in the arrest of Nelson Mandela

#210

Earlier quoted context omitted.

All in all it seems like social-democracy was AOK as long as you were an established European nation. But try that with a colony or some place with a large US corporate presence (banana republic, anyone?) and you were begging for trouble. Frankly the cold war seems in hindsight to be just an extension of the so called great game.

It's only the appearance of social-democracy that matters in Europe. It doesn't matter which party is in power, as long as policy is broadly neo-liberal and not too aggressively anti-corporate. When someone like Jeremy Corbyn appears and challenges or threatens that consensus, you immediately get a determined media campaign to smear and undermine him - while barking mad racist demagogues are treated as serious politi…

Please do not confuse England with mainland Europe. There is a reason why so many English politicians want to distance themselves from Europe...
Post reply on HN