A professor built a chatbot to be his teaching assistant
washingtonpost.com
A professor built a chatbot to be his teaching assistant
1–10 of 120 posts
Re: A professor built a chatbot to be his teaching assistant
#2This will be a fantastic Turing test, at least as far as basic question understanding and natural response formation.
Re: A professor built a chatbot to be his teaching assistant
#3I don't know why SMH would take a Washington Post story and change the title to something stupid, while keeping everything else the same, but that's what they've done.
Wait.. there's one more difference. A pathetic picture of "an AI".
"an AI"? Seriously SMH, just use the original title. Your editorial blundering is embarrassing, and could easily be replaced with "an AI" tasked with re-wording headlines.
Re: A professor built a chatbot to be his teaching assistant
#4Of course, Turing was right. What's outside of the set of computable sets? Not much!
I recently read an article headline that talked about creeps using AI to stalk porn stars. It's interesting to think that as computation power continues to grow, there's a huge potential for evil uses of AI. All of the things we see and hear and consider "public" have little or no nefarious uses to other humans. But what about a computer that has human-like capabilities and inexhaustible computation resources? The sci-fi scenarios of conscious AI making decisions to save humanity from itself are not what I fear. The evil humans sitting at the helm of powerful AI is what I fear.
A lot of society's norms are predicated on humans having private thoughts and telling small and large lies as appropriate. What happens when AI-augmented humans know when you're lying?
The future is so exciting and so terrifying.
Re: A professor built a chatbot to be his teaching assistant
#5I wonder how good it is when people don't know what they're asking. This used to happen all the time when I was in tutorials. "I don't get why there's two transistors in a chain". "What's the significance of the process being adiabatic?"
If you can crack that, education will be changed forever, massively.
Re: A professor built a chatbot to be his teaching assistant
#6I've had a couple of TAs who I strongly suspected of being chatbots, even when I was talking to them in person. I'm still not 100% convinced they were human.
Re: A professor built a chatbot to be his teaching assistant
#7"Goel plans to use Jill again in a class this fall, but will likely change its name so students have the challenge of guessing which teaching assistant isn't human." This will be a fantastic Turing test, at least as far as basic question understanding and natural response formation.
For example, if a guy is able to answer questions at all times of day, really fast, they're either an AI or Jon Skeet.
Also, real TAs have a life outside of the course. What will an AI say when you ask them whether they enjoyed last night's episode of Game of Thrones?
Re: A professor built a chatbot to be his teaching assistant
#8That's stunning. I studied AI in undergrad and I just didn't give it enough of my focus at the time. Little did I know that in my lifetime I'd see real world evidence of computers passing the Turing Test with flying colors. Of course, Turing was right. What's outside of the set of computable sets? Not much! I recently read an article headline that talked about creeps using AI to stalk porn stars. It's interesting to…
Re: A professor built a chatbot to be his teaching assistant
#9Is this normal?
Re: A professor built a chatbot to be his teaching assistant
#10This is definitely an impressive result, but I'm pretty sure it was made easier by the opposite pattern. I've had a couple of TAs who I strongly suspected of being chatbots, even when I was talking to them in person. I'm still not 100% convinced they were human.
Next step will be to replace the prof, and then have the students replaced by surprisingly attentive interrogative expert systems, and the cycle will be complete.