Australian ISP filtering policy is not evidence-based
whirlpool.net.au
Australian ISP filtering policy is not evidence-based
1–8 of 8 posts
Re: Australian ISP filtering policy is not evidence-based
#2A well written article.
From my understanding, it is largely Senator Conroy who is trying push this through (for reasons I cannot fathom). It has been noted that if the current Australian government were to be replaced by the opposition, the Minister for Communications would have to be replaced. Helen Coonan (the past Liberal Senator responsible for it) was also in charge of implementing a filtering scheme - http://www.netalert.gov.au/ (The state of that link will inform you how successful that was.)
I'm uncertain whether replacing Conroy would curb internet filtering in Australia, or merely change it's focus once more.
Re: Australian ISP filtering policy is not evidence-based
#3Of course it's not evidence-based!
God needs no evidence to know that you're a filthy pervert. He merely smites thee with his ability to withhold 0.1 percent of online pornography!
Re: Australian ISP filtering policy is not evidence-based
#4A well written article. From my understanding, it is largely Senator Conroy who is trying push this through (for reasons I cannot fathom). It has been noted that if the current Australian government were to be replaced by the opposition, the Minister for Communications would have to be replaced. Helen Coonan (the past Liberal Senator responsible for it) was also in charge of implementing a filtering scheme - http://w…
Speculation, but I think it makes sense:
http://blog.acooper.org/2009/12/speculation-the-real-villain...
tl;dr: Labor are using the filter as a political means to an end, to court the conservative Christian senator Steve Fielding's vote on the ETS (Fielding is more or less a climate change sceptic). Fielding, along with independent Nick Xenophon, hold disproportinate power in the Senate.
Re: Australian ISP filtering policy is not evidence-based
#5Laboratory Evaluation, wholesale" rel="nofollow">http://www.shoesgroups.com/reebokanswer-c-70.html>wholes... reebok answershoes, pump
technology can support the players affect the soles of the feet and legs friction weight, these href="wholesale" rel="nofollow">http://www.shoesgroups.com/reebokanswer-c-70.html>wholes... reebok answer shoes are the perfect combination of speed
and passion. This wholesale reebok answer shoe has launched an all-star red, black and the world, these two limited edition
colors. Series, as fans should not miss the fine, We are free shippmtand a week to your door.004
Re: Australian ISP filtering policy is not evidence-based
#6Very reasoned discussion of the issues.
However, there's no evidence that any inadvertent access is taking place
There is; it just doesn't get reported because no one realises it. It might even be on your "FavouritPornSite.com" of choice. That's the problem - how DO they filter that... (answer, they can't)
Re: Australian ISP filtering policy is not evidence-based
#7This is the clearest and most reasonable discussion of the issues that I have seen.
I fear it won't make any difference what anybody says: Conroy is wedded to this policy by a secret deal with independents in the senate and he'll see it through no matter what. Besides, every poll done of the public returns support of ~80%. We, the technically literate folks in Australia, have failed to educate our fellow citizens to understand how useless, counterproductive and dangerous this filter will be. The conservatives won't block it, they love the idea of control over the internet. They can't wait to get in power and start pulling the levers themselves.
It's been a long time since I felt so depressed about my native country.
Re: Australian ISP filtering policy is not evidence-based
#8A well written article. From my understanding, it is largely Senator Conroy who is trying push this through (for reasons I cannot fathom). It has been noted that if the current Australian government were to be replaced by the opposition, the Minister for Communications would have to be replaced. Helen Coonan (the past Liberal Senator responsible for it) was also in charge of implementing a filtering scheme - http://w…
Speculation, but I think it makes sense: http://blog.acooper.org/2009/12/speculation-the-real-villain... tl;dr: Labor are using the filter as a political means to an end, to court the conservative Christian senator Steve Fielding's vote on the ETS (Fielding is more or less a climate change sceptic). Fielding, along with independent Nick Xenophon, hold disproportinate power in the Senate.
> Fielding, along with independent Nick Xenophon, hold disproportinate power in the Senate.
Isn't this (parties with a couple of representatives holding the balance of power) a consequence of proportional representation?
I mention PR because it is often touted as a solution to US problems.