Live data from Hacker News

Introducing WhatsApp's Desktop App

blog.whatsapp.com

51–60 of 228 posts

Re: Introducing WhatsApp's Desktop App

#51
post #16
post #2

No linux version. I was almost convinced that this was going to be another Electron app (after slack went that route)

I recommend Franz ( http://meetfranz.com/ ). Does Whatsapp, works on Linux, mac, pc. Supports Slack, WeChat, HipChat, Facebook Messenger, Telegram, Google Hangouts, GroupMe and Skype.

...which, for what it's worth, is an Electron app. :)

Re: Introducing WhatsApp's Desktop App

#52
post #40

Earlier quoted context omitted.

As kawera said two comments above yours: Their servers do not store unencrypted messages so they need to come from the phone. ---- That's why some people criticise Telegram: Their messages have to be stored unencrypted for their setup to work.

Exactly. Telegram's "Secret Conversations" are encrypted end-to-end but then they aren't synced (or even supported on desktop).

My workaround for this is to create a group chat. I only talk to two people on Signal but I've asked both of them to message in the group chat that I've made. Now, I can answer chat messages on my nexus 5, nexus 6, and nexus 7. (I built the apk from source for the Nexus 7. I wouldn't recommend this if you actually want secrecy. I'm not doing anything confidential so I am not too worried about targeted attempts.)

Re: Introducing WhatsApp's Desktop App

#54
post #19
post #11

Windows 8 minimum? Is this an UWP app or what's the reasoning here? Edit: I downloaded and successfully launched this on Windows 7. It seems like a standard Electron app. Now I wonder if the Windows 8 requirement is purely for tech support reasons, or if there's some specific feature that would fail on Windows 7.

Microsoft doesn't support Windows 7 any more, why should WhatsApp?

You are misinformed. Microsoft even supports Vista, not to mention 7. [1] In addition, if XP support deadline extensions are anything to go by, then these Windows 7 end-of-support dates will get moved several times until they stick. Beyond that, Windows 7 remains by far the most popular Windows version, exceeding the combined market share of Windows 8, Windows 8.1 & Windows 10. [2][3]

Unrelated to market share & OS updates, there's the technical question. There aren't many Win32 APIs which are present in Windows 8, but not Windows 7. Thus it's not that likely that Windows 7 wouldn't be supported by a Win32 app (which this is), unless they go out of their way to make it so.

[1] http://windows.microsoft.com/en-us/windows/lifecycle

[2] http://www.w3schools.com/browsers/browsers_os.asp

[3] https://www.netmarketshare.com/operating-system-market-share...

Re: Introducing WhatsApp's Desktop App

#55
post #16
post #2

No linux version. I was almost convinced that this was going to be another Electron app (after slack went that route)

I recommend Franz ( http://meetfranz.com/ ). Does Whatsapp, works on Linux, mac, pc. Supports Slack, WeChat, HipChat, Facebook Messenger, Telegram, Google Hangouts, GroupMe and Skype.

I really wish it supported Signal.

Edit:

Still pleased to use it, I don't like the Skype client for Linux.

Re: Introducing WhatsApp's Desktop App

#56
post #54
post #19

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Microsoft doesn't support Windows 7 any more, why should WhatsApp?

You are misinformed. Microsoft even supports Vista, not to mention 7. [1] In addition, if XP support deadline extensions are anything to go by, then these Windows 7 end-of-support dates will get moved several times until they stick. Beyond that, Windows 7 remains by far the most popular Windows version, exceeding the combined market share of Windows 8, Windows 8.1 & Windows 10. [2][3] Unrelated to market share & OS u…

> You are misinformed.

According to Wikipedia I'm not: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Windows_7#Support_lifecycle

"Mainstream support for 7 ended on January 13, 2015."

I think it's reasonable that businesses don't support an OS version beyond the OS's provider's own "mainstream support".

> Thus it's not that likely that Windows 7 wouldn't be supported by a Win32 app (which this is), unless they go out of their way to make it so.

Possibly, but listing support on their website means they support it, and why should they do that if, again, Microsoft itself does not?

Re: Introducing WhatsApp's Desktop App

#57

Earlier quoted context omitted.

With a desktop app you can easily and quickly command-tab to it if you want to use it. In contrast with a web app it's often awkward and time consuming to find the window/tab of the web app you're running amongst your other browser windows/tabs.

Not really. Extract the web.whatsapp tab into its own window and now you can command-tab to it. ---- Plus, on my OS at least, I can even search for the window by its title. That, combined with workspaces, is an organizer's godsend.

This isn't how cmd+tab works on a Mac.

Do you mean alt+tab in Windows?

Re: Introducing WhatsApp's Desktop App

#58
post #7

This is not an independent app. It is still tethered to the phone, and can't work without it :(

Just when I started using web app my gut told me that Facebook wont allow WhatsApp to directly compete with messenger and Facebooks messaging platform.

If both would allow similar technology they not only would be fighting over the same market, but would be easy target to anti-monopoly bodies.

Post reply on HN