Medical Equipment Crashes During Heart Procedure Because of Antivirus Scan
21–30 of 211 posts
Re: Medical Equipment Crashes During Heart Procedure Because of Antivirus Scan
#22https://xkcd.com/463/ The whole structure is wrong. I used to work in medical equipment repair. Windows Embedded is running so many devices it's not funny. But it's not just Windows that's the problem. I put a linux-system on a PACS network to diagnose equipment. It was a headless, and we asked the IT group to block it off from the Internet. Hospital IT: "Does it have antivirus?" Me: "..."
http://www.fda.gov/MedicalDevices/Safety/ListofRecalls/ucm48...
At least three of them are Class 1 - May cause death
And all of those are software related, none run Windows
http://www.fda.gov/MedicalDevices/Safety/ListofRecalls/ucm48...
http://www.fda.gov/MedicalDevices/Safety/ListofRecalls/ucm48...
http://www.fda.gov/MedicalDevices/Safety/ListofRecalls/ucm48...
Re: Medical Equipment Crashes During Heart Procedure Because of Antivirus Scan
#23Earlier quoted context omitted.
correlation doesn't imply causation.... except when someone selected windows, and then made 50 other moronic decisions also. half the work done in this industry is just dealing with stupid decisions made by stupid people. i just accept this now.
But when Windows is chosen because it is easier to find coders who will 'remain within the budget' (cheapcheap) and cannot even make sure the virus scanner doesn't run during procedures or at all it goes a bit too far.
Unfortunately, this total disregard for safety isn't just software anymore. When we stat skipping lessons that we've know for a looooooonng time (such as why a split bobbin is an important feature in a transformer[1]), we have evidence of a serious need for strongly enforced regulation.
Re: Medical Equipment Crashes During Heart Procedure Because of Antivirus Scan
#24Why on earth is medical equipment running standard Windows? This is the ideal location for some basic RTOS or even just an embedded Linux. Seems like a huge cost and risk for no gain.
Re: Medical Equipment Crashes During Heart Procedure Because of Antivirus Scan
#25Earlier quoted context omitted.
But when Windows is chosen because it is easier to find coders who will 'remain within the budget' (cheapcheap) and cannot even make sure the virus scanner doesn't run during procedures or at all it goes a bit too far.
"Cheaper" or "remain within the budget" doesn't excuse using inadequate parts that don't meet the design requirements. Unfortunately, this total disregard for safety isn't just software anymore. When we stat skipping lessons that we've know for a looooooonng time (such as why a split bobbin is an important feature in a transformer[1]), we have evidence of a serious need for strongly enforced regulation. [1] https://n…
Edit;
> we have evidence of a serious need for strongly enforced regulation.
Better education? But I guess strongly enforced regulation will force companies to not go for the cheapest solutions they can get away with which in turn will require people with actual knowledge in the field which will require better education, somehow.
Re: Medical Equipment Crashes During Heart Procedure Because of Antivirus Scan
#26Medical equipment require an authorization to use. Any change to the medical equipment requires another authorization or it's prohibited.
By "any change" , it includes Windows Update(it changes the system obviously).
The result: they use anti-malware software to protect(or rather, believed to protect) unpatched Windows.
At least one anti-malware software company(Trend Micro), marketing that their software can protect the medical equipment in such situation.
Re: Medical Equipment Crashes During Heart Procedure Because of Antivirus Scan
#27https://xkcd.com/463/ The whole structure is wrong. I used to work in medical equipment repair. Windows Embedded is running so many devices it's not funny. But it's not just Windows that's the problem. I put a linux-system on a PACS network to diagnose equipment. It was a headless, and we asked the IT group to block it off from the Internet. Hospital IT: "Does it have antivirus?" Me: "..."
Re: Medical Equipment Crashes During Heart Procedure Because of Antivirus Scan
#28https://xkcd.com/463/ The whole structure is wrong. I used to work in medical equipment repair. Windows Embedded is running so many devices it's not funny. But it's not just Windows that's the problem. I put a linux-system on a PACS network to diagnose equipment. It was a headless, and we asked the IT group to block it off from the Internet. Hospital IT: "Does it have antivirus?" Me: "..."
List of FDA medical equipment recalls for 2016 http://www.fda.gov/MedicalDevices/Safety/ListofRecalls/ucm48... At least three of them are Class 1 - May cause death And all of those are software related, none run Windows http://www.fda.gov/MedicalDevices/Safety/ListofRecalls/ucm48... http://www.fda.gov/MedicalDevices/Safety/ListofRecalls/ucm48... http://www.fda.gov/MedicalDevices/Safety/ListofRecalls/ucm48...
Re: Medical Equipment Crashes During Heart Procedure Because of Antivirus Scan
#29Putting antivirus on equipment at all indicates a much bigger problem. That the equipment is somehow configured to be susceptible to viruses.
Re: Medical Equipment Crashes During Heart Procedure Because of Antivirus Scan
#30Why on earth is medical equipment running standard Windows? This is the ideal location for some basic RTOS or even just an embedded Linux. Seems like a huge cost and risk for no gain.
Given the sheer amount of overhead in enterprise BS medical hardware has (read: sales people likely get the biggest chunk of the absorbed costs) it wouldn't be a surprise to me that the engineering teams amount to a skeleton crew while 70%+ of the personnel involved are non-engineers that override the professional decisions of the engineers.