Live data from Hacker News

Inside Palantir

buzzfeed.com

61–70 of 319 posts

Re: Inside Palantir

#61
The problem with Palantir is the following:

Three letter agencies are paying and will continue to pay for Palantir consulting and products.

However Palantir has been unable to fully productize their solution (it is still pretty much consulting). Thus they have hard time convincing Fortune 500 companies to pay due to the costs and depending too much on human interaction.

Re: Inside Palantir

#62
post #48

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Buzzfeed was also respnsible for outing tennis fixing in The Tennis Racket using statistical analysis of players' matches.

Buzzfeed is shaping up to be the one of the best sources for investigative journalism. Who would have thought?

Kind of amazing when you consider their first 5-6 years, actually.

Maybe there's hope for us all, is the way I look at it.

Re: Inside Palantir

#63
post #44

> “One of the things we did well early on was to recognize and invest in the unique talents of each Palantirian” I find it a bit weird how tech companies make up names for their employees now. Googler, Palantirian... does this make people work harder because they feel like they belong or something?

it appeals to that primitive instinct of belonging to a pack, fostering an us-vs-them mentality. this way, you are less likely to leave and are encouraged to give your 110%

It's also not just a tech thing, in consulting you have your McKinseyites, BCGers and Bainies

Re: Inside Palantir

#64

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Oh my god, what the hell is that thing! For all that money, they couldn't have hired a product management/design team?

Note the timestamp on the video... their products look sweet now.

Do you have any recent pictures of the products?

Re: Inside Palantir

#65
post #48

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Buzzfeed is shaping up to be the one of the best sources for investigative journalism. Who would have thought?

AFAIK, that was always the plan. You need a huge audience to have the revenue to do great journalism online, and one of the few proven ways to build that audience is with clickbait and listicles. So while it may seem like Buzzfeed has a split personality, it's very much intentional.

While I'm sure plenty of people might disagree with my sentiment, I feel Gawker had a shot at this back in the day when they had Neetzan Zimmerman writing all the "viral" articles and bringing in some majority percentage of the daily PVs. This then gave room for others to do some great/interesting journalism.

Re: Inside Palantir

#66

My understanding is that Palantir is running an engineering mill/sweatshop using fresh out of school CS grads (particularly from Stanford). That much of their time is spent simply writing client-specific code that imports and cleans up data from disparate enterprise systems. That its not challenging, innovating, or exciting. Of course this is all anecdotal based on what I've heard from friends and a Palantir engineer…

They also like to recruit from around Washington DC area schools (Univ. of Maryland for example). Saw them at career fairs while also recruiting there. They all wear cool hoodies and project this agile young startup image. It seems to work, there is a decent size line of young hopeful grads wanted to work there.

Re: Inside Palantir

#67
post #44

> “One of the things we did well early on was to recognize and invest in the unique talents of each Palantirian” I find it a bit weird how tech companies make up names for their employees now. Googler, Palantirian... does this make people work harder because they feel like they belong or something?

A shortcut to avoid calling them "Palantir employees"?!

Re: Inside Palantir

#68
post #64

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Note the timestamp on the video... their products look sweet now.

Do you have any recent pictures of the products?

You can find some public stuff here: https://dribbble.com/palantir

I don't have anything else to point you to unfortunately.

Re: Inside Palantir

#69

This article was way, way better sourced than I thought it'd be. Especially for Buzzfeed of all places.

for me, buzzfeed is like hyundai. Hyundai had the reputation prob anytime before 8ish years ago of being total unreliable shit. However, they made a massive set of enigineering improvements, created better styling and started standing behind their products with the best warranty in the industry, 100k miles. They even created a luxury line under the hyundai brand and started offering more expensive cars. During hte period, their stock started actually doing well[0].

It has since, gone down a bit and I won't say it is 100% the point I will make next,but it factors in. Buzzfeed is a lot like Hyundai. While Hyundai killed in the low-cost market, no middle class consumer wanted a hyundai. Their brand had negative value.

Just as quality longform content is not read by the same people who read buzzfeed. So they(bf) will not adopt users, just as hyundai slipped a bit after the marketing relaxed and consumers remembered that the "image" conveyed by hyundai was low-income/cheap. While they had erased the real problem, shitty engineering, the image was just as important.

So buzzfeed should rebrand or meta-structure itself if, at least in my non-expert off the cuff opinion, it wants to ever sell content. Obviously, ancilliary advertisements are will be dead very soon, but buzzfeed is really good at writing advertising copy, they call it journalism i think.

However, as stated above and evidenced by this very article they are breaking some good stories, and are funded by a16z. They have quality journalists who have access and are equipped & talented to write great articles. I just think that most of the people who would value that article, would never read it from buzzfeed. buzzfeed should channel out services like vox and rebrand.

tl;dr know your customer

[0]http://finance.yahoo.com/echarts?s=005380.KS+Interactive#sym...

Post reply on HN