Live data from Hacker News

SpaceX lands rocket at sea second time after satellite launch

phys.org

161–170 of 497 posts

Re: SpaceX lands rocket at sea second time after satellite launch

#161

Good work! I still think that they should have some grippers on the barge, or a net, ready to spring and grasp the rocket on landing, instead of carrying flimsy legs all the way to space and back.

And land the rocket on the bell of the rocket motor? The legs are for more than keeping the rocket from tipping over.

Re: SpaceX lands rocket at sea second time after satellite launch

#162

I remain confused about why SpaceX is getting so much fanfare and praise. What have they accomplished that NASA didn't already accomplish during the Apollo missions? I know SpaceX is doing it all more cost effectively, because we have better technology, but have they actually accomplished anything tangible that NASA didn't a generation ago?

Based on some talks the first lunar landings were way more adventurous and lucky than what SpaceX is doing. Making a snooker trick shot is nice, announcing it and doing it twice is another thing.

What about announcing it and doing it six times?

That's the number of times we landed men on the moon.

Let's not try to downplay NASA's previous successes as "lucky" and "adventurous" in order to make SpaceX seem more advanced in an engineering sense.

Re: SpaceX lands rocket at sea second time after satellite launch

#163

Here is the video http://www.space.com/32811-spacex-rocket-landing-jcsat-14-la... Hopefully we won't have the typical hacker news discussion about why the employees chant USA.

> Hopefully we won't have the typical hacker news discussion about why the employees chant USA. By saying this, you have now guaranteed that there will be. Well done.

Luckily, your comment averted it.

(And my own, being a third-order effect, is too weak to affect the outcome.)

Re: SpaceX lands rocket at sea second time after satellite launch

#164
post #121

Earlier quoted context omitted.

The current legs aren't flimsy, and they seem way less complicated than a gripper system would have to be. How would a gripper system handle off-centered landings? It would have to catch the falling rocket very quickly because there's not much fuel left in the tank to hover. Your proposed system would add a lot of complexity, all for the small decrease in launch mass.

I'm still surprised there's no active system on the barge to secure the rocket. Even now they seem to be able to stick the landing with some reliability, it's always nice to have belt and suspenders. I'm thinking a system with a pillar at each corner of the barge, pairs of cables between opposite pillars, and puller cables to open out the main cables into an iris-type aperture which can be rapidly closed on the rocke…

I remember reading somewhere that the actual shell of the rocket is surprisingly thin and very fragile against horizontal forces.

Think of it like a very long can of soda with a ton of lead at the bottom. Any kind of attempt to keep it upright only at the top will most likely end up damaging the shell.

That's why their method of securing it after it lands is to weld the feet, the bottom of this thing is pretty much the only part that's solid, the rest is flimsy as hell in every direction but one.

Re: SpaceX lands rocket at sea second time after satellite launch

#165
>P.S. Downvotes for this question? Really?

There are always people on HN who love being contrarian and trying to diminish amazing things. It's like they hate seeing people excited for something and want to point out that this isn't that big of a deal.

We're literally watching things happen for the first time ever, and this person's response is "what's so great about this?" while implying that people who are excited about this are fanboys. I can understand the downvotes honestly.

Re: SpaceX lands rocket at sea second time after satellite launch

#166
post #158

Earlier quoted context omitted.

The center of mass of the rocket is _very_ low. According to Elon, the CRS-8 core was very stable (it needed even less stabilization than they thought it did). They may add some means to secure it if it needs to travel through rough seas on the way home, but if the conditions are calm enough to land, they're calm enough for the stage to be stable. Watch the CRS-8 landing and look at how much the barge is rolling whil…

The response crew comes and secures the legs on the barge immediately after landing. They bolt them down somehow, I think.

they actually weld "shoes" over each of the legs, but Elon even tweeted that it was entirely unnecessary to do on the previous landing.

Re: SpaceX lands rocket at sea second time after satellite launch

#167
post #154

How are non-US space agencies and companies (like ESA, Russia, Japan, China, etc) reacting to the SpaceX and Blue Origin achievements? Are they also testing similar things but we aren't hearing? Or they aren't threatened by the advances?

Airbus is working on Adeline, which would fly back and recover the first-stage engines and avionics (but not the fuel tanks) on an Ariane rocket.

The Chinese have mentioned an effort to recover and reuse first stages by landing them with parachutes.

So far, the Russians seem to think the effort isn't worthwhile.

Closer to home, ULA's new Vulcan rocket is supposed to recover the first stage engines (but again, not the fuel tanks) using a parachute and helicopter.

It remains to be seen whether any of these schemes will work or how long they'll take. They have a lot of catching up to do in any case.

Re: SpaceX lands rocket at sea second time after satellite launch

#168
Am i missing something, is the need to land vertically a requirement of a fragile fuselage? Seems wasteful to carry extra anything (in this case rocket propellant) to space, just to avoid having to re-right the rocket when you get it back on earth for a subsequent launch. Is extra fuel payload < landing gear or parachutes?

Re: SpaceX lands rocket at sea second time after satellite launch

#169

Earlier quoted context omitted.

> Use a big funnel mesh? I'm not sure you realize just how fragile the stage is. The side walls are made of _very_ thin aluminum. Any landing support mechanism must put the impact force on the 'octaweb' structure that supports the engines. That's the advantage of the legs. They can be engineered to distribute the force exactly where they want it. A significant problem with any sort of "catching" mechanism is that the…

...or how big it is. That's a 12 storey empty beercan, on fire, hurtling in from space. Any catching hack would require the stage to slow down anyway.

[1] is the picture that finally gave me a sense of scale for this thing...

[1] http://i.stack.imgur.com/FYvrC.jpg

Re: SpaceX lands rocket at sea second time after satellite launch

#170
post #28

I always try to watch the webcasts and I can't help but cringe so hard when they start chanting 'USA USA USA', every single time. What is up with that?

It's a quirky American thing. But plenty of other countries do it to. Not surprisingly it originates in sports like most of these kinds of chants. Go to an international football/soccer match sometime and let me know how many national chants you hear.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FwHFm3pBA90 ("TAE HAN MIN GUK!" "Great Korean People's Country")

Here's a show giving fun lessons on how to properly do the chant https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_Wli6OrUhNU

Here's the history of it

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/U-S-A!

I've heard a bunch of Brits chant something similar "UK! UK! UK! UK!" before.

Here it is in Uraguay https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nub526rufzk

In Canada https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KiK3f-fEDdY

In Chile, I've heard the chant is something like "CHI CHI CHI! LE LE LE! EN EL MAPA NO SE VE!", here's a comedic routine around it https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Gigjq9GExuE

Here's the Mexican equivalent https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=s1ips57oLX0

Here's Sweden after a sports win https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jkfqHCwB4aY

If France had a SpaceX equivalent that did something as amazing as this, it would be completely appropriate for the French people who spent years of their lives achieving something thought impossible to suddenly break out and start singing La Marseillaise or chanting.

If it happens for something as unimportant as a sporting goal, it's probably okay for it to happen for something that advances the entire species.

I'm kind of surprised by all the people from different countries that aren't even aware it happens in their own country or that they might have a similar national chant.

Post reply on HN