Live data from Hacker News

Bitcoin 'creator' backs out of Satoshi coin move 'proof'

bbc.co.uk

21–30 of 294 posts

Re: Bitcoin 'creator' backs out of Satoshi coin move 'proof'

#21
post #15

My (non-provable) theory is that Satoshi is not a person but a team, now defunct, that was tasked with developing a crypto-currency. They are probably more scientists/mathematicians/economists than they are software developers, which would explain the very sound but not exactly elegant initial code. It would also explain the silence - the project is over, the team is probably bound to secrecy because this stuff is cl…

> The only time Satoshi spoke out was to help the poor bloke who was mistaken to be Satoshi no, the forum account was hacked to make that claim. It wasn't by Satoshi.

> no, the forum account was hacked to make that claim. It wasn't by Satoshi.

Are you sure, I wasn't aware of that?

Edit: the "I am not Dorian Nakamoto" was on March 7 2014, the account hack on Sept 8 of same year. It doesn't prove it conclusively. In fact the hack may well have been done deliberately, for a (kind of) plausible deniability (i.e. now you can't tell whether it was the real "Satoshi" and thus there was no provable breach of secrecy).

Re: Bitcoin 'creator' backs out of Satoshi coin move 'proof'

#22

Okay seriously, is anyone contacting the authorities to see if this man is still alive? I do not know who to contact or what his location is. His "blog" post sounds like a suicide note - I've had the misfortune of reading others, and there are telltale signs - and it doesn't appear that anyone is taking steps to see if he's okay. Maybe he is a liar, maybe he's Satoshi, who gives a shit at this point when the jaded co…

Thank you for posting this <3

Re: Bitcoin 'creator' backs out of Satoshi coin move 'proof'

#23

Source: http://www.drcraigwright.net/ Asides the conversation, the whole source code of this website is: This man is really not caring. EDIT: site is updated now, with proper html+css coding.

> Asides the conversation, the whole source code of this website is:

You're kidding right ?

EDIT : no he isn't .

Re: Bitcoin 'creator' backs out of Satoshi coin move 'proof'

#24

Source: http://www.drcraigwright.net/ Asides the conversation, the whole source code of this website is: This man is really not caring. EDIT: site is updated now, with proper html+css coding.

Some of the website is still in archive.org, but will probably disappear soon. Any snapshots before May have already disappeared. Might help for folks to download the old posts before they disappear from the web entirely.

Frustratingly, it appears the main screenshots from the Sartre post (showing his original 'proof') have already been removed from archive.org.

Re: Bitcoin 'creator' backs out of Satoshi coin move 'proof'

#25
post #12

It is interesting to note that the only Satoshi-existence scenario whose probability improves with each passing day, is the scenario in which Satoshi / the "Satoshis" is/are dead (unless you think Bitcoin was the first great invention of hyper-advanced AI, of course). Figuring out whether anyone actually knows who Satoshi is/was becomes more interesting than waiting for the person(s) to show up, because it will never…

If Satoshi is dead or not an individual person, then who owns his bitcoin? If Satoshi is dead, then his property would be subject to the probate laws of his home country. Can the bitcoin of a dead person be recovered if they don't make arrangements for it in their will? Or will blocks of bitcoin become inactive over time as their owners die?

Re: Bitcoin 'creator' backs out of Satoshi coin move 'proof'

#26
post #16

One thing that gives me a little pause and makes me think maybe he is telling the truth (even though all other evidence and logic says he's a fraud) is that the real Satoshi has not put out a statement calling this guy out as a fraud. When the Dorian Nakamoto stuff happened the real Satoshi put out a statement saying he's not Dorian. That wasn't that long ago. If he did that you'd think he'd step up and say he's not…

It's not that unlikely that satoshi is dead given the sudden silence. Someone like Craig Wright might have gambled on that fact.

Re: Bitcoin 'creator' backs out of Satoshi coin move 'proof'

#27

Okay seriously, is anyone contacting the authorities to see if this man is still alive? I do not know who to contact or what his location is. His "blog" post sounds like a suicide note - I've had the misfortune of reading others, and there are telltale signs - and it doesn't appear that anyone is taking steps to see if he's okay. Maybe he is a liar, maybe he's Satoshi, who gives a shit at this point when the jaded co…

[deleted]

Re: Bitcoin 'creator' backs out of Satoshi coin move 'proof'

#28
post #16

One thing that gives me a little pause and makes me think maybe he is telling the truth (even though all other evidence and logic says he's a fraud) is that the real Satoshi has not put out a statement calling this guy out as a fraud. When the Dorian Nakamoto stuff happened the real Satoshi put out a statement saying he's not Dorian. That wasn't that long ago. If he did that you'd think he'd step up and say he's not…

I'm sure the goal of such step is exactly this -- to leave some room for doubt. The conman was moved in a corner during last few days, it was the only logical step left. It's only few commands to prove that you really poses the original key, no need for drama, screenshots and buggy scripts.

Re: Bitcoin 'creator' backs out of Satoshi coin move 'proof'

#30
post #12

It is interesting to note that the only Satoshi-existence scenario whose probability improves with each passing day, is the scenario in which Satoshi / the "Satoshis" is/are dead (unless you think Bitcoin was the first great invention of hyper-advanced AI, of course). Figuring out whether anyone actually knows who Satoshi is/was becomes more interesting than waiting for the person(s) to show up, because it will never…

I wonder about this. It's seems like the most likely scenario. But... from my understanding Satoshi made appropriate effort to pass on the Bitcoin project before he disappeared. So unless he was leaving to commit suicide, I don't think he _has_ to be dead. (he == she == they)
Post reply on HN