Live data from Hacker News

The Secret Culprit in the Theranos Mess Is the Tech Press

vanityfair.com

81–90 of 91 posts

Re: The Secret Culprit in the Theranos Mess Is the Tech Press

#81

Non-tech press outlet: "Uhh, it wasn't us, it was them."

I do not understand why a rebranded geocities website to give everyone their own personal webpage, a 140 maximum character length bulletin board website, and glorified touchscreen bookmarks for websites are still considered to be examples of innovation. Facebook, twitter and apps have been around in some form since the beginning of the internet.

Lab-on-a-chip technology has the potential to be the science fiction equivalent of a medical tricorder. Every doctor could have one and give instant patient feedback. Yet the expectation for this start up is to get it perfect from the beginning. They may lose all their VC's money but I bet that DARPA would still bankroll them.

Re: The Secret Culprit in the Theranos Mess Is the Tech Press

#82

Earlier quoted context omitted.

> Theranos has been pitched as revolutionary without even mentioning the founder That is false. Almost every profile of Theranos doubles as a profile of Elizabeth, complete with photo shoots of her in her signature black turtleneck (after all, there is no actual technology to be shown) and the statement that she's the youngest self-made female billionaire.

The black turtleneck itself is no accident or coincidence. It's a carefully calculated wardrobe choice meant to invoke images of the late Steve Jobs.

I think you may have meant evoke: http://public.wsu.edu/~brians/errors/evoke.html

Re: The Secret Culprit in the Theranos Mess Is the Tech Press

#83
post #77

Earlier quoted context omitted.

This is some incredibly bizarre reasoning from the T editor: > it was my mistake in not asking her if there were any potential conflicts. This was an oversight on my part. I say this not as an excuse, but she is, separately from her husband, a billionaire (making her through marriage a billionaire twice over) and for that reason I think I failed to consider any monetary conflict in her case. She assumes that rich peo…

I think what they are saying is that she is independently wealthy - as such they didn't check into her husband in the same way they would have if she depended on him for money.

I take it that you are not claiming it is not wrong ?

Regardless of whether she depends on her husband for money, or if she was independently rich, there can still be conflict of interest.

Re: The Secret Culprit in the Theranos Mess Is the Tech Press

#84

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Wait what? Seriously, can I get a link on that one?

Of course no one is going to come out and admit that Ian Gibbons's suicide was caused by anything other than the "health and other problems" insinuated by Theranos's PR flack. Also we have to treat every suicide as a tragic failure of mental healthcare availability, rather than (occasionally) a rational reaction to intolerable circumstances. Gibbons was a top biochemist, hired away from academia with the copious comb…

I have a theory of suicide, don't know what actual psychiatry says about it. But it seems to me that some patterns in suicide that defy simple notions of privilege may be explained by impossible expectations.

White Americans kill themselves more often than Black Americans, but Native Americans more than whites again. Some very rich groups (e.g. Hollywood stars and their kids) kill themselves often, but also some extremely poor groups (Indian subsistence farmers - possibly in connection to microcredit).

If I'm correct, the sexism of lower expectations may be a contributing factor why women kill themselves less than men, and the racism of low expectations has a similar effect on blacks.

Native Americans, on the other hand, may be more or less as socially disadvantaged as blacks in the US (correct me if I am wrong), but grow up with romanticised notions of themselves from majority culture and (First-)nationalist idealization from their own, creating an image it's especially hard to live up to from social and economic deprivation.

Celebrities have a lot of economic and social opportunity, but also everyone knows they have it, and everyone's eyes are on them. Expectations are accordingly high.

And for the poor subsistence farmers, there's nothing like a debt letter to say "you should be doing this, why aren't you doing this?". Before, they might have starved, but at least it wouldn't be their fault. Now there's a formal legal document saying that it basically is, and the entire village is involved in pushing that lesson in (if I understand microcredit practices correctly).

You call suicide an occasionally rational reaction. I'm not sure if I agree, but it does remind me of a bug I had in a connect four program many years ago. It could look ahead four-five moves or so, but it had a poor evaluation function, so it would often find itself in situations where the opponent could force a win. When it did, it played randomly. I had forgotten to penalize an early loss over a late loss, so every move seemed equally bad to it. Maybe for some suicidal people, similarly all outcomes seem 100% unacceptable, and so suicide just becomes one random equally bad option out of many.

Re: The Secret Culprit in the Theranos Mess Is the Tech Press

#85
post #17

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I wrote about UBeam here.[1] It's come up several times on YC, and most readers are skeptical. The megahertz ultrasound part can't work in air; attenuation goes up rapidly with frequency, which is why megahertz ultrasound isn't used much. Their patents talk about 75 KHz, which propagates OK in air. But the sound levels they talk about are insane. Their numbers imply a few kilowatts of power going in. You do not want…

There's a whole lot of people who want there to be a successful female entrepreneur so badly that they're willing to give a rising star the benefit of the doubt. It doesn't help that most members of this cheerleading squad seem to have little more than a middle school level understanding of physics or biology, and no desire to dive into the science before heaping praise on the charlatan of the hour.

Yes, there was a time briefly where the topic of 'Diversity' was the only thing the media talked about. It seems that the media sometimes get caught up in their own hype.

Re: The Secret Culprit in the Theranos Mess Is the Tech Press

#86
post #52

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Although that article is (misleadingly) hosted on nytimes.com, it was not published in the New York Times , but in T: The New York Times Style Magazine . Also, it was written by Silicon Valley socialite Laura Arrillaga-Andreessen, and not an NYT reporter.

And the author was slammed by the NYTimes editor for not disclosing conflict of interest throughout that piece (Marc Andreesen invested heavily in AirBNB through A16Z / Laura Arrillaga-Andreesen is his wife) http://recode.net/2015/10/29/nyt-public-editor-blasts-arrill...

By the New York Times Public Editor, who isn't part of the normal editorial process - she's meant to represent the readers and handle their complaints about things like undisclosed conflicts of interest.

Re: The Secret Culprit in the Theranos Mess Is the Tech Press

#87
My hunch is that Holmes, clearly a highly intelligent woman, has a personality infused with high levels of narcissism and sociopathy. Her intelligent, curious side was probably overwhelmed by her negative traits after she had some initial success with Theranos.

Re: The Secret Culprit in the Theranos Mess Is the Tech Press

#88
post #77

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I think what they are saying is that she is independently wealthy - as such they didn't check into her husband in the same way they would have if she depended on him for money.

I take it that you are not claiming it is not wrong ? Regardless of whether she depends on her husband for money, or if she was independently rich, there can still be conflict of interest.

I'm not claiming anything. It's obviously wrong, and the editor admits as such - I was just paraphrasing their reasoning behind the mistake.

Re: The Secret Culprit in the Theranos Mess Is the Tech Press

#89
post #31

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Newspapers struggle to pay the bills, though. If it looks like a lawsuit will cost a lot of money, many papers will just walk. It also increases the cost of fact checking the story.

> If it looks like a lawsuit will cost a lot of money, many papers will just walk. What is this assertion based on? News organizations large and small carry insurance to protect them from lawsuits like this. Will the general counsel grill the newsroom leadership to make sure they can back up what's being printed and that they're not violating the law? Absolutely. But that doesn't mean they will be cowed by threats of…

Look at the fun that Gawker [0] has had. Granted they're not as highbrow as the New York Times or Wall Street Journal. I haven't heard of recent stories of the NYT or WSJ backing down, but they are now very corporate, and make P&L decisions.

There was a time when newspapers took higher moral stands, but now it's more about P&L decisions.

[0] http://money.cnn.com/2016/05/02/media/hulk-hogan-gawker-seco...

Re: The Secret Culprit in the Theranos Mess Is the Tech Press

#90
post #35

Anybody care to run the numbers on j-school grads at 'traditional' publishers v techcrunch et al? I stopped reading techcrunch years ago when it became clear they largely copied & pasted PR. Rarely do they ask competitors/industry pundits to comment, a standard journalistic practice.

I wouldn't use J-School grads as a particular proxy for anything. I've known J-School grads who worked for various IT publications (though not for less conventional pubs like Techcrunch). But then I know a number of WSJ reporters and op-ed (as well as at least one person who moved from IT trades to general business) who don;t have J-School degrees. There are a lot of ways to learn standard journalistic practice witho…

My point is I would expect to find a heck of a lot more "journalists" working for a traditional media outlet than in the tech press
Post reply on HN