Live data from Hacker News

Introducing the Infinit file system

blog.infinit.one

31–40 of 63 posts

Re: Introducing the Infinit file system

#31

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Reply to myself since I cannot edit: Depending on how much storage you need, it might be cheaper to get a dedicated server or colo your own versus getting a virtual machine. Feel free to reply if you have questions on this.

Any advice on getting either of those in Australia for less than an arm and a leg?

I don't know about colos, but https://www.vultr.com/ has presence in Sydney. They offer both VMs and block storage at reasonable prices.

Re: Introducing the Infinit file system

#32
post #22
post #20

1. Protocol level filesystems featured by a company (single point of failure) 2. Uses existing services in ways those other companies may not like. (Serf in someone else's walled garden) 3. Closed-source, with maybe promises of open sourcing later 4. Hard to search, given the name is -e from a real word 5. Relies on extensive network bandwidth, especially in cases upload is scarce To think of a few.... As converse, I…

IPFS serves a totally different purpose and can't be used in any reasonable way to achive what Infinit seems to be doing.

Can you elaborate, please? My initial reaction was the same as grandparent post - maybe IPFS doesn't have all the security things stated up front, but these things seem similar.

Re: Introducing the Infinit file system

#33
post #9

This looks really great and I love the direction. Hopefully they're working on making it more consumer-friendly. ;) Questions: 1. They say that "While most solutions (Dropbox, GlusterFS, OwnCloud etc.) store your files unprotected in the cloud or on a specific server, we took a diametrically opposed direction by relying heavily on encryption. Whenever a file is stored in Infinit, it is cut into chunks, every chunk is…

The part about GlusterFS storing files unencrypted is untrue, BTW. We've had full at-rest encryption using client-only keys for years before they came along. Makes me wonder how many of their other "original ideas" are just failure to do basic research before jumping in to make a buck.

Re: Introducing the Infinit file system

#34
post #29
post #27

Thought this looked familiar, this is from February and they still have the source as "coming soon (tm)". So until that coming soon becomes released I'm not really all that bothered by this thing.

It's 2nd may today man.

Sure, still doesn't give me any hope as to when/if it will get released.

Re: Introducing the Infinit file system

#35

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Reply to myself since I cannot edit: Depending on how much storage you need, it might be cheaper to get a dedicated server or colo your own versus getting a virtual machine. Feel free to reply if you have questions on this.

Any advice on getting either of those in Australia for less than an arm and a leg?

Move to a building that has the NBN. ;)

Re: Introducing the Infinit file system

#36
post #9

This looks really great and I love the direction. Hopefully they're working on making it more consumer-friendly. ;) Questions: 1. They say that "While most solutions (Dropbox, GlusterFS, OwnCloud etc.) store your files unprotected in the cloud or on a specific server, we took a diametrically opposed direction by relying heavily on encryption. Whenever a file is stored in Infinit, it is cut into chunks, every chunk is…

The part about GlusterFS storing files unencrypted is untrue, BTW. We've had full at-rest encryption using client-only keys for years before they came along. Makes me wonder how many of their other "original ideas" are just failure to do basic research before jumping in to make a buck.

I was going to agree but decided to load up web site to be sure:

https://www.gluster.org/

I don't see a list of features at all here or an obvious link to them. Most sites have something like this (see "Why Sector/Sphere?"):

http://sector.sourceforge.net/

Or this:

http://lustre.org/about/

Wait, that one almost sucks as much as GlusterFS site. It could also use a page detailing exactly what it can and can't do with obvious link on front-page. At least it had obvious link and basic description, though.

So, hard to judge writer of recent post on what features were in GlusterFS, etc if their page doesn't go through the trouble to list them without us having to dig. I'd have to point two fingers. Fortunately, Wikipedia to rescue doing what site didn't do:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/GlusterFS

Note: Oh shit, it still doesn't mention encryption. Not in the comparison or list of distributed filesystems either. Still undocumented for casual researcher.

Re: Introducing the Infinit file system

#38

How would this be better/different than https://tahoe-lafs.org/trac/tahoe-lafs ?

Here is their comparison with Tahoe: https://infinit.sh/documentation/comparison/tahoe-lafs

If you flip on the "Compare" switch there, the two differences it shows are:

1) Infinit is redundant using replication while Tahoe uses erasure codes

2) Infinit supports heterogenous storage backends, while Tahoe is homogenous

Re: Introducing the Infinit file system

#40

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Reply to myself since I cannot edit: Depending on how much storage you need, it might be cheaper to get a dedicated server or colo your own versus getting a virtual machine. Feel free to reply if you have questions on this.

Any advice on getting either of those in Australia for less than an arm and a leg?

Ramnode has a bunch of locations and is hands-down the best VPS provider I've ever used, and I've used literally hundreds over the last fifteen or so years. The vast majority are a flash in the pan, and very few actually don't suck. Ramnode has always been super solid for me, and very reasonably priced. Take every other recommendation with a grain of salt. VPS is one of those industries that attracts the scummiest human beings on the planet.
Post reply on HN