Live data from Hacker News

Founders of Amazon and Microsoft funding little-known fusion energy companies

bbc.com

1–10 of 53 posts

Re: Founders of Amazon and Microsoft funding little-known fusion energy companies

#5
TLDR

There are a handful of private companies working on new/not well researched approaches to cracking fusion using private capital while Government projects like National Ignition Labs and ITER suck most of the public funding to work on mainstream methods.

There are two companies of note,

1) General Fusion (funded in part by Bezos) working on something called magnetised target fusion

Here's how it works: first, magnetic fields are used to confine a superheated plasma of volatile deuterium and tritium isotopes. This plasma is then injected into a sphere, where it's briefly contained in a vortex of liquid metal. Next, pistons converging towards the centre of the sphere simultaneously strike an anvil at the end of their cylinder, sending a shock wave into the plasma. This burst of energy causes the plasma to compress and the deuterium-tritium fuel to ignite – producing, in theory, a tremendous burst of energy.

2)Tri Alpha (Paul Allen) using a reactor tech called called a “field-reversed configuration.” This type of device has more in common with Iter's tokamak-style reactor than General Fusion’s machine: it uses magnetic confinement and heat, rather than compression, to induce fusion, and it produces energy continuously, instead of in bursts. The advantage of a field-reversed configuration over a tokamak is that its engineering is much simpler. But from a physics perspective, the technology is far less well-developed.

Conclusion is that both these companies are following long shot techs and it's challenging for them to raise capital since they'll take a long long time to give VC an exit, if ever. But if they work, then their investors hit jackpot.

Re: Founders of Amazon and Microsoft funding little-known fusion energy companies

#8
post #5

TLDR There are a handful of private companies working on new/not well researched approaches to cracking fusion using private capital while Government projects like National Ignition Labs and ITER suck most of the public funding to work on mainstream methods. There are two companies of note, 1) General Fusion (funded in part by Bezos) working on something called magnetised target fusion Here's how it works: first, mag…

We've banned your account because we asked you not to post these. If you don't want it to be banned, you're welcome to email hn@ycombinator.com.

Re: Founders of Amazon and Microsoft funding little-known fusion energy companies

#9
post #8
post #5

TLDR There are a handful of private companies working on new/not well researched approaches to cracking fusion using private capital while Government projects like National Ignition Labs and ITER suck most of the public funding to work on mainstream methods. There are two companies of note, 1) General Fusion (funded in part by Bezos) working on something called magnetised target fusion Here's how it works: first, mag…

We've banned your account because we asked you not to post these. If you don't want it to be banned, you're welcome to email hn@ycombinator.com.

Why was this user ban?

________

EDIT: So, much for any calms of transparency[1]:

(1) It's not clear why the user was ban.

(2) Mod requested to deal with the issue offline.

-- To be clear, this is NOT about debating the matter, it's about transparency and helping the community understand how things work. To be more clear, I've posted and seen others post TLDR and unclear if these shouldn't be posted on HN, or if there's something else going on.

[1] When dang took over HN, the topic of transparency was covered, and though I may have misunderstood, more transparency was promised.

Re: Founders of Amazon and Microsoft funding little-known fusion energy companies

#10
Has anyone since reasonable explanation of what the future would look like with fusion?

To me, there will never be enough energy, this effort is about control, not power; even if there was (relatively speaking) an unlimited source of energy, the bounds of it's use would quickly be found, and as such, would not be "universally" available.

Post reply on HN