SpaceX’s SuperDraco Thruster
arstechnica.com
SpaceX’s SuperDraco Thruster
1–8 of 8 posts
Re: SpaceX’s SuperDraco Thruster
#2Re: SpaceX’s SuperDraco Thruster
#3Re: SpaceX’s SuperDraco Thruster
#4Landing things on Mars is harder than landing on Earth in many ways. The atmosphere is so thin that you don't lose a lot of energy during atmospheric entry (which helps since payloads don't need a lot of heat shielding) but it also means that parachutes don't slow you down nearly enough.
That's why the Pathfinder had to land using a complicated airbag system. Even using parachutes and rocket braking, it impacted the surface at over 50mph.
If SpaceX succeeds with their thruster landing system, payloads will be significantly easier to put on the ground and won't have to be engineered to withstand such extreme forces.
Re: SpaceX’s SuperDraco Thruster
#5Re: SpaceX’s SuperDraco Thruster
#6SpaceX's ambitions to land on Mars are exciting, especially using a thruster system. Landing things on Mars is harder than landing on Earth in many ways. The atmosphere is so thin that you don't lose a lot of energy during atmospheric entry (which helps since payloads don't need a lot of heat shielding) but it also means that parachutes don't slow you down nearly enough. That's why the Pathfinder had to land using a…
Re: SpaceX’s SuperDraco Thruster
#7Entire burn is about 4 seconds.
Re: SpaceX’s SuperDraco Thruster
#8SpaceX's ambitions to land on Mars are exciting, especially using a thruster system. Landing things on Mars is harder than landing on Earth in many ways. The atmosphere is so thin that you don't lose a lot of energy during atmospheric entry (which helps since payloads don't need a lot of heat shielding) but it also means that parachutes don't slow you down nearly enough. That's why the Pathfinder had to land using a…
Wouldn't it be awesome if future Mars science missions had a nice, constant landing platform they could design around? Like a new rover or stationary science base would just be "one Dragon unit of cargo".