Live data from Hacker News

Microsoft Flow

flow.microsoft.com

51–60 of 100 posts

Re: Microsoft Flow

#51

Just watched the "how it works" video and I'm less than impressed (can anything impress me these days?). "Why constantly check e-mail when you can get a text message when anyone important e-mails you..." Actually, I receive a push notification whenever I receive an email. I'd hate to receive SMS messages instead of e-mails. --- "Say someone tweets something about your company. Set up a flow that follows them, sends a…

> Yeah, so someone tweets "YourCompany fucking sucks!"

No one would ever use twitter solely for that purpose...surely...

Re: Microsoft Flow

#52
post #40

Earlier quoted context omitted.

They obviously did some type checking on the name[1]. I'm sure they Squared up the UI elements while they were developing it[2]. The moments before launch must have been pretty tense though[3]. I just hope this service supports file uploads[4]. 1. https://github.com/facebook/flow 2. https://github.com/square/flow 3. https://github.com/tensorflow/tensorflow 4. https://github.com/flowjs/flow.js

They probably used FTP while developing [5] and a lot of online chatting [6]. [5] http://fivedetails.com/flow/ [6] https://www.getflow.com/apps/

To get it done, they would have used project management [7] whilst management decided on EDI integration suites. [8]

7. https://www.getflow.com

8. http://www.flowsoftware.com

Re: Microsoft Flow

#53
post #51

Just watched the "how it works" video and I'm less than impressed (can anything impress me these days?). "Why constantly check e-mail when you can get a text message when anyone important e-mails you..." Actually, I receive a push notification whenever I receive an email. I'd hate to receive SMS messages instead of e-mails. --- "Say someone tweets something about your company. Set up a flow that follows them, sends a…

> Yeah, so someone tweets "YourCompany fucking sucks!" No one would ever use twitter solely for that purpose...surely...

Unlikely, that tweet has no spelling errors.

Re: Microsoft Flow

#54
post #36

Microsoft always gives the vibe of a company that is desperate to salvage some pride from its glory days. It was once a giant, but now they're on the brink of redundancy, in terms of being viewed as "innovative". This opinion may be controversial to many, but it is what a lot of people are thinking. They experiment, which is phenomenal. But none of those experiments have been a major hit. Apple has flagship products…

Wait why is apple being held up as an example of an innovative company again? As far as i am aware apple had the ipod in 2001, the iphone in 2007 and the ipad in 2010. Pretty much every release of any of those items in the last 6 years have been incremental upgrades. This isnt to be negative on Apple, just saying they are a great quality, style, design company. and an amazing financial success but they havent been in…

They prevented root from modifying anything in /usr/bin - that's a fairly unique innovation I'd have thought.

Re: Microsoft Flow

#55
post #15

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Did you actually read it? It has integration with a ton of non-Microsoft products?

If you're going to be pedantic over an obvious joke, then at least be more specific than "a ton." Total service breadth (11) is presently countable on fingers while naked.

Do you have really big fingers?

Re: Microsoft Flow

#57

Just watched the "how it works" video and I'm less than impressed (can anything impress me these days?). "Why constantly check e-mail when you can get a text message when anyone important e-mails you..." Actually, I receive a push notification whenever I receive an email. I'd hate to receive SMS messages instead of e-mails. --- "Say someone tweets something about your company. Set up a flow that follows them, sends a…

Yesss!

Re: Microsoft Flow

#58

To me, this looks like their own implementation of the Azure Logic Apps product. ( https://azure.microsoft.com/en-us/documentation/articles/app... ). I don't believe this is intended to be a consumer level product at all. In that sense, it's not an IFTTT competitor. Given it's got implementation points to Sql Azure, Azure Blob storage, swagger, etc. this is likely meant as a product for devs to use to hook-up integra…

I think you're right...the available services list looks very similar to what's available in Flow: https://azure.microsoft.com/en-us/documentation/articles/api...

Re: Microsoft Flow

#59

To me, this looks like their own implementation of the Azure Logic Apps product. ( https://azure.microsoft.com/en-us/documentation/articles/app... ). I don't believe this is intended to be a consumer level product at all. In that sense, it's not an IFTTT competitor. Given it's got implementation points to Sql Azure, Azure Blob storage, swagger, etc. this is likely meant as a product for devs to use to hook-up integra…

Exactly what I was going to say. I setup some logic apps but never really dug into this much beyond their demos.

Following on the heels of this will be Azure's Functions (Serverless/Lambda) architecture, which will overlap some things here (for devs).

Re: Microsoft Flow

#60
post #46

Just watched the "how it works" video and I'm less than impressed (can anything impress me these days?). "Why constantly check e-mail when you can get a text message when anyone important e-mails you..." Actually, I receive a push notification whenever I receive an email. I'd hate to receive SMS messages instead of e-mails. --- "Say someone tweets something about your company. Set up a flow that follows them, sends a…

You might be right in the certain situations but this is an open tool with a wide array of possible uses for people. Such a pessimistic approach doesn't allow for any exploration when think about its potential uses.

Frankly, I don't really care. Really. It might be the greatest tool ever created..

There's too much great software and not enough head space to fit it all in.

This proliferation of tools and services hasn't achieved the proverbial "work less do more" which all of them promise.

They are necessary in order to deal with the increased complexity of technology (and our lives), but the catch is - once we integrate them into our work(life)flow, we add another layer of complexity and hence give up even more control to third parties.

I guess this is why Flow has been created, but the catch is the same - once you integrate it, you add another layer of tweaking and twiddling until it all becomes a monster with a life of its own.

There was an article here on HN yesterday - 'you probably don't need any js lib for your project' and I totally agree with the author.

We can live without layers upon layers of complexity, albeit with a bit more 'manual' work - we have to reduce it rather than try to build meta layers on top of existing ones.

Sorry for the gloomy mood, I guess it's the weather.

Post reply on HN