Live data from Hacker News

Docker for Mac Beta Review

medium.com

191–200 of 367 posts

Re: Docker for Mac Beta Review

#191

Earlier quoted context omitted.

> it looks like a web app would have to be rebuilt from the ground up to fit that model. Not at all! The app market is full of apps that were not originally written for Sandstorm: https://apps.sandstorm.io/ Examples: Wekan, Etherpad, Rocket.Chat, EtherCalc, draw.io, Gogs, Dillinger, NodeBB, EtherDraw, ... It turns out that converting a web app to Sandstorm is mostly deleting code. You delete your user management, you…

Thank you for your response. Sorry, I'm still not getting it. Not even talking about big data, what I mean is a very simple database application, say with 10k documents in a document based storage model. Now let's say I want to show a list view and a sum over one of the fields in those documents. You'd probably agree that this is a typical usecase for a productivity app. Now how would I do this in the sandstorm model…

> You'd probably agree that this is a typical usecase for a productivity app.

Actually I can't think of any app that matches the abstract problem you describe. Can you give a specific example? Usually the answer to these problems becomes much clearer in the context of a specific app.

Re: Docker for Mac Beta Review

#192
post #91

Can anybody in HN provide a quickpath into the beta? I signed up when it was first announced (seems to be over 30 days ago: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=11352389 ) but haven't heard anything back yet.

If you're comfortable sharing your Docker ID, feel free to share it here and we'll fast-track you! Generally anyone who cares enough to ask directly, we'll automatically add to the top of the list. EDIT: or, feel free to contact us privately with a few details on your configuration and use case: feedback+hn@docker.com

I'd like to be added. ID: unrealhoang.

Thanks.

Re: Docker for Mac Beta Review

#193
post #111

I'm also in the beta, and I like it a lot. It's functionally equivalent to `dlite`, which Nathan LaFreniere has done an extremely good job on. He deserves massive credit for making OSX Docker dev bearable and for providing the inspiration for "Docker for Mac". A few issues I've seen: 1. I cannot believe they are using `docker.local`. This hostname will cause nothing but trouble for years to come. DON'T USE `.local`!…

I thought we should be using .local because it was specified in RFC 6762. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/.local

That is the multicast dns rfc, and says .local is used for zeroconf and not manual site-local configuration:

   Any DNS query for a name ending with ".local." MUST be sent to the
   mDNS IPv4 link-local multicast address 224.0.0.251 (or its IPv6
   equivalent FF02::FB)

Re: Docker for Mac Beta Review

#194
post #91

Earlier quoted context omitted.

If you're comfortable sharing your Docker ID, feel free to share it here and we'll fast-track you! Generally anyone who cares enough to ask directly, we'll automatically add to the top of the list. EDIT: or, feel free to contact us privately with a few details on your configuration and use case: feedback+hn@docker.com

We are using docker for developing and testing services in the same environment they are put in production in: Debian. My personal docker ID is chrisbuchholz.

Hey, I don't see you on the beta list as having signed up. You'll need to have signed up at https://beta.docker.com/ first.

Re: Docker for Mac Beta Review

#195
post #91

Can anybody in HN provide a quickpath into the beta? I signed up when it was first announced (seems to be over 30 days ago: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=11352389 ) but haven't heard anything back yet.

If you're comfortable sharing your Docker ID, feel free to share it here and we'll fast-track you! Generally anyone who cares enough to ask directly, we'll automatically add to the top of the list. EDIT: or, feel free to contact us privately with a few details on your configuration and use case: feedback+hn@docker.com

Thank you. snowmanak

Re: Docker for Mac Beta Review

#196
post #91

Can anybody in HN provide a quickpath into the beta? I signed up when it was first announced (seems to be over 30 days ago: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=11352389 ) but haven't heard anything back yet.

If you're comfortable sharing your Docker ID, feel free to share it here and we'll fast-track you! Generally anyone who cares enough to ask directly, we'll automatically add to the top of the list. EDIT: or, feel free to contact us privately with a few details on your configuration and use case: feedback+hn@docker.com

athyuttamre

I'm a student using Docker for many projects, including one for my university. Thanks!

Re: Docker for Mac Beta Review

#197

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Thank you for your response. Sorry, I'm still not getting it. Not even talking about big data, what I mean is a very simple database application, say with 10k documents in a document based storage model. Now let's say I want to show a list view and a sum over one of the fields in those documents. You'd probably agree that this is a typical usecase for a productivity app. Now how would I do this in the sandstorm model…

> You'd probably agree that this is a typical usecase for a productivity app. Actually I can't think of any app that matches the abstract problem you describe. Can you give a specific example? Usually the answer to these problems becomes much clearer in the context of a specific app.

Pretty much anything you'd like to do with CouchDB or MongoDB. Replace "document based storage" with table based and you have pretty much any *SQL application.

So I guess my question is: How do you expect people to use your fine grained model with databases? If the answer is "not at all" then I find the scope too limiting. If the answer is "1 grain == 1 db" then I find the claim that you are solving difficult permission problems to be false.

Note: I don't want to be too critical here, I'm just trying to pick holes in your claims of scope so I can categorise the power of sandstorm and how far it could be useful for things I'd like to build.

Re: Docker for Mac Beta Review

#198
post #91

Can anybody in HN provide a quickpath into the beta? I signed up when it was first announced (seems to be over 30 days ago: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=11352389 ) but haven't heard anything back yet.

If you're comfortable sharing your Docker ID, feel free to share it here and we'll fast-track you! Generally anyone who cares enough to ask directly, we'll automatically add to the top of the list. EDIT: or, feel free to contact us privately with a few details on your configuration and use case: feedback+hn@docker.com

Docker ID: milep

Using for php and rails apps with mysql, postgres and redis.

Re: Docker for Mac Beta Review

#199
post #91

Can anybody in HN provide a quickpath into the beta? I signed up when it was first announced (seems to be over 30 days ago: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=11352389 ) but haven't heard anything back yet.

If you're comfortable sharing your Docker ID, feel free to share it here and we'll fast-track you! Generally anyone who cares enough to ask directly, we'll automatically add to the top of the list. EDIT: or, feel free to contact us privately with a few details on your configuration and use case: feedback+hn@docker.com

Would love to explore this further.

ID: mentalpiracy

Re: Docker for Mac Beta Review

#200
post #91

Can anybody in HN provide a quickpath into the beta? I signed up when it was first announced (seems to be over 30 days ago: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=11352389 ) but haven't heard anything back yet.

If you're comfortable sharing your Docker ID, feel free to share it here and we'll fast-track you! Generally anyone who cares enough to ask directly, we'll automatically add to the top of the list. EDIT: or, feel free to contact us privately with a few details on your configuration and use case: feedback+hn@docker.com

ID: errorific

Trying to clean up our local machine dev setups

Post reply on HN