The average size of Web pages is now the average size of a Doom install
1–10 of 467 posts
Re: The average size of Web pages is now the average size of a Doom install
#2Re: The average size of Web pages is now the average size of a Doom install
#3Re: The average size of Web pages is now the average size of a Doom install
#4Oh, and you need a loop? \adds underscore.js\
Re: The average size of Web pages is now the average size of a Doom install
#5It's not really surprising in a world where a graphical driver is > 100 MB (Nvidia driver for Windows).
Re: The average size of Web pages is now the average size of a Doom install
#61) This is an irrelevant statistic.
2) Even if this were true it's not that big of a deal.
This is irrelevant because most people don't browse the average web page. They browse the top few sites on the internet and that's it. A more relevant statistic would be what have the sizes of the top 50 sites been over the last 15 years. I imagine they still may have grown on average, but download speeds have also grown over that time. Especially on mobile.
Even if we accept the premise that web sites as a whole, including the most popular ones are all growing and are now an average of 2.2MB each. Who cares? 2.2MB is nothing in 2016. Even on an LTE connection that's probably between 4 and 1.5 seconds to download the full page. And a lot of that size is probably in ads, which nobody minds if they load last or not at all.
Lastly, this is a self fixing problem. If a site is too bloated, users will stop going to it.
But I would propose that a lot of this increase in size is due to users (especially mobile) having higher and higher resolution displays, which necessitates higher resolution content, which of course is bigger.
Re: The average size of Web pages is now the average size of a Doom install
#7With the majority of users moving towards mobile, I really think this is an issue, and I've been consciously building projects as lean as possible. Removing bloated jquery libraries was a big one. With native calls like document.querySelectorAll document.querySelector I've found I can 90% get by without it. For the rest, using something like vue.js, and I've taken care of all the dom manipulation, data binding, etc.
Re: The average size of Web pages is now the average size of a Doom install
#8With the majority of users moving towards mobile, I really think this is an issue, and I've been consciously building projects as lean as possible. Removing bloated jquery libraries was a big one. With native calls like document.querySelectorAll document.querySelector I've found I can 90% get by without it. For the rest, using something like vue.js, and I've taken care of all the dom manipulation, data binding, etc.
Re: The average size of Web pages is now the average size of a Doom install
#9Although I get really annoyed when I visit a blog post whose page is 100x larger than Dostoevsky's novels in .txt format. On my blog (https://pljns.com/blog/), JQuery and genericons are often my largest file transfers, but I still clock under 500kb.
Re: The average size of Web pages is now the average size of a Doom install
#10> The average size of Web pages is now the average size of a Doom install It's not really surprising in a world where a graphical driver is > 100 MB (Nvidia driver for Windows).