Matt, I'm reprinting my reply on your blog here: Duuuude, NO! Or at least, that's what I want to scream at you after reading this. But it is hard for me to refute your logic around investors. Of course, SV has a larger and older network. Can't deny that. But, of course, in SV there are also waaaay more entrepreneurs vying for VC dolla bills. Having spent time in both locations, I wouldn't say it's any easier to raise…
NYC vs Silicon Valley
11–20 of 55 posts
Re: NYC vs Silicon Valley
#12[Wall Streeters turned venture capitalists] are people who do dumb shit like ask about pricing for a premium version of a genuinely novel product (in a category with no existing market) that hasn't even launched yet...in the first meeting. Right, because asking about pricing (you know, the process by which you charge actual money for a product, thus generating revenue and hopefully profit) is a completely unreasonabl…
Re: NYC vs Silicon Valley
#13a) Wall Street has been a huge talent suck for a long time...the default dream...: Work for Lehman. Actually, there is a bigger talent suck than Lehman. I can easily see the appeal of working for a startup rather than Lehman: don't wear a suit, don't deal with bureaucracy or MBAs, technology rules the day. Less money, but a lot more fun. Now, consider many small hedge funds: don't wear a suit, no bureaucracy, maybe o…
Re: NYC vs Silicon Valley
#14[Wall Streeters turned venture capitalists] are people who do dumb shit like ask about pricing for a premium version of a genuinely novel product (in a category with no existing market) that hasn't even launched yet...in the first meeting. Right, because asking about pricing (you know, the process by which you charge actual money for a product, thus generating revenue and hopefully profit) is a completely unreasonabl…
Re: NYC vs Silicon Valley
#15Matt, I'm reprinting my reply on your blog here: Duuuude, NO! Or at least, that's what I want to scream at you after reading this. But it is hard for me to refute your logic around investors. Of course, SV has a larger and older network. Can't deny that. But, of course, in SV there are also waaaay more entrepreneurs vying for VC dolla bills. Having spent time in both locations, I wouldn't say it's any easier to raise…
New York will succeed as a startup hub if the rents come down fast enough. Right now, they're still too high; you pretty much have to work a Wall Street job or be parentally supported to live here, and this is a problem.
Re: NYC vs Silicon Valley
#16a) Wall Street has been a huge talent suck for a long time...the default dream...: Work for Lehman. Actually, there is a bigger talent suck than Lehman. I can easily see the appeal of working for a startup rather than Lehman: don't wear a suit, don't deal with bureaucracy or MBAs, technology rules the day. Less money, but a lot more fun. Now, consider many small hedge funds: don't wear a suit, no bureaucracy, maybe o…
The technological problems that you work on in a hedge fund are less interesting than those you do in a startup. On the other hand, making actual money has benefits.
One two-person team I got to work with was doing something resembling stat-arb, and was pushing about $250 million of trades in the last 10 minutes of the market. Beyond getting to be hands on with some crazy math, building a system to make that happen isn't exactly trivial.
Re: NYC vs Silicon Valley
#17The other investors here (the wall streeters turned VCS) just don't get it. They're not investing, as you say, in "change the world" ideas. They're investing in stuff that can make money right away, which is probably why they ask about pricing prematurely.
NYC is frustrating in this respect, and it's easy to see why you're thinking about the West Coast. They're just way more intelligent, early-stage investors. That's changing though, I believe. It just sucks to be a startup in this sort of purgatory. The more Ron Conway's that come to the east the better!
Re: NYC vs Silicon Valley
#18a) Wall Street has been a huge talent suck for a long time...the default dream...: Work for Lehman. Actually, there is a bigger talent suck than Lehman. I can easily see the appeal of working for a startup rather than Lehman: don't wear a suit, don't deal with bureaucracy or MBAs, technology rules the day. Less money, but a lot more fun. Now, consider many small hedge funds: don't wear a suit, no bureaucracy, maybe o…
The technological problems that you work on in a hedge fund are less interesting than those you do in a startup. On the other hand, making actual money has benefits.
Hedge fund work tends to be more quantitative than most startup work, and tends to focus on different issues (less UI, latency vs scaling, minimizing transaction costs vs minimizing EC2 costs). Having looked at both hedge funds and startups, I'd say the work can be interesting at both.
To make a completely loaded comparison, I think programming a computer to beat the market is much more interesting than building a facebook/twitter "me too" site.
To make a less loaded comparison, I also find algorithmic trading more interesting (as a technical problem) than connecting $LOCAL_SELLER to $LOCAL_BUYER in $LOCAL_MARKET, or solving the problem of crappy restaurant websites (both of which I think are great business models).
Re: NYC vs Silicon Valley
#19a) Wall Street has been a huge talent suck for a long time...the default dream...: Work for Lehman. Actually, there is a bigger talent suck than Lehman. I can easily see the appeal of working for a startup rather than Lehman: don't wear a suit, don't deal with bureaucracy or MBAs, technology rules the day. Less money, but a lot more fun. Now, consider many small hedge funds: don't wear a suit, no bureaucracy, maybe o…
The bigger problem is that Hedge Funds develop an expensive lifestyle. Expensive lifestyles are hard to change.
I made this change. I'm 26 and have no kids. My girlfriend's in school but will be able to support both of us when she's out. It's mildly annoying not to have a maid and nice vacations right now, but working on interesting problems is more important than having those comforts, which are disposable for now (you don't need help until you have kids, really). Then again, I can also still afford basic necessities; if I couldn't, I'd have to go back to Wall Street.
The major problem in New York is that rent is ridiculous. Most "lifestyle" factors (vacations, alcohol) are flexible and can be deferred for a few years, but rent is non-negotiable. If it stays this high, the city will bleed talent too fast to reach "critical mass". You want the freshly unemployed quants (although quants are among the last to be let go) to stick around in the city for 6 months, not move back in with their parents because of New York rent.
Regarding lifestyle expenses, any guess as to where top traders spend most of their leisure income? Gambling. I never thought I'd meet people smarter than me who find "games" like Roulette and Craps to be interesting and worth playing (because I'm a game designer and a Euro-snob who'd rather play Tigris than Poker) but I have. This is because it's visceral and not intellectual-- people with the "gambling gene" make great traders but I wouldn't want one as a co-founder (long digression omitted).
I'm going to bet on the Midwest as the startup hub of the 2010s. There are a lot of brilliant graduates of schools like Chicago, Northwestern, Carleton, Michigan, and Grinnell whose graduates (for geographic reasons) are not nearly as likely to go to Wall Street (or Silicon Valley) as their coastal counterparts. Most of them go into graduate school, seeing that as the best option for them, because often it is. Wall Street under-recruits the Midwest, and there aren't a lot of cutting-edge companies out there-- yet. If you want to hire talent on the cheap, buy a set of winter clothes and head out to the Great Lakes region.