Theranos Is Subject of Criminal Probe by U.S
21–30 of 226 posts
Re: Theranos Is Subject of Criminal Probe by U.S
#22Such subpoenas don’t necessarily mean prosecutors are actively seeking an indictment. People familiar with the matter said the investigation is at an early stage.
In addition to the criminal probe, the Securities and Exchange Commission is examining whether Theranos made deceptive statements to investors when it solicited funding, according to people familiar with the matter. Theranos was valued at $9 billion in a funding round in 2014 and the majority stake of Elizabeth Holmes, the startup’s founder and chief executive, at more than half that.
Has there been any other examples of such high profile entrepreneurs ending up at the wrong end of a criminal investigation?
Re: Theranos Is Subject of Criminal Probe by U.S
#23Earlier quoted context omitted.
The SEC is getting more aggressive about regulating large pseudo-public companies that haven't had a formal IPO, but which have many "qualified" investors.[1] Mutual funds now invest in these companies, which means ordinary investors are at risk. The SEC chair on "unicorns": "It is axiomatic that all private and public securities transactions, no matter the sophistication of the parties, must be free from fraud. Exch…
"tough on Unicorns" :) The plight of Theranos has just become much worse as they will probably be made an example of.
Re: Theranos Is Subject of Criminal Probe by U.S
#24non-paywall link: http://on.wsj.com/1VyFPIt
Re: Theranos Is Subject of Criminal Probe by U.S
#25Such subpoenas don’t necessarily mean prosecutors are actively seeking an indictment. People familiar with the matter said the investigation is at an early stage.
In addition to the criminal probe, the Securities and Exchange Commission is examining whether Theranos made deceptive statements to investors when it solicited funding, according to people familiar with the matter. Theranos was valued at $9 billion in a funding round in 2014 and the majority stake of Elizabeth Holmes, the startup’s founder and chief executive, at more than half that.
Has there been any other examples of such high profile entrepreneurs ending up at the wrong end of a criminal investigation?
Re: Theranos Is Subject of Criminal Probe by U.S
#26Here's a television parody I wrote about Theranos that ends right where this story begins... http://pricks.com
Re: Theranos Is Subject of Criminal Probe by U.S
#27As part of the deal, Walgreens has invested at least $50 million into Theranos, according to people familiar with the matter.
It really blows my mind that Theranos was able to get this far with what sounds like technology that simply didn't work. Did any investors simply try the test(s) before investing vast sums of money?
Re: Theranos Is Subject of Criminal Probe by U.S
#28Re: Theranos Is Subject of Criminal Probe by U.S
#29https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=7951019
or
https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=8181339
I find it insightful to see who was "right" and who was "wrong". There were a surprising number of people from the medical field expressing doubts about the technology.