Building an IBM Watson-powered AI Chatbot in 50 lines of code
1–10 of 30 posts
Re: Building an IBM Watson-powered AI Chatbot in 50 lines of code
#2Re: Building an IBM Watson-powered AI Chatbot in 50 lines of code
#3With todays abundance of APIs, libraries etc, the phrase "in xx lines of code" should be put to rest.
Here is someone sharing their experiment/code and the best that can be said is "gotta put to rest this phrase".
Not that I am particularly interesting in chat bots, but what is disconcerting is the attitude of hurling negativity into a thread of discussion.
Why not just skip it and not say anything and move on to another topic?
Maybe it's ok to be negative if this is a news piece from NYT, but it is sad watching that happen in response to someone showing what they've been hacking on.
"What did you do today?" -- "I built a cool chat bot"
"What about you?" -- "I told the person who built a chat bot to change the title, cause I didn't like his title".
Re: Building an IBM Watson-powered AI Chatbot in 50 lines of code
#4If you are interested, there are more advanced techniques as well. For example, https://github.com/watson-developer-cloud/conversational-age... shows a conversational agent that combines a natural language classifier with a dialog engine. The cool thing about using NLC is that you can infer user intent from ambiguous inputs to make a more robust bot.
It will be interesting to see if all this new interest in bots represents the coming of useful bots or if it's just a fad. I love using bots in specific, tool-like ways, like getting github updates. But seeing someone build up a bot that can really tackle natural language to do useful things in a predictable manner would be amazing and could change how we interact with computers in general.
Disclosure: I am a Watson Developer Cloud Evangelist
Re: Building an IBM Watson-powered AI Chatbot in 50 lines of code
#5Re: Building an IBM Watson-powered AI Chatbot in 50 lines of code
#6With todays abundance of APIs, libraries etc, the phrase "in xx lines of code" should be put to rest.
> With todays abundance of APIs, libraries etc, the phrase "in xx lines of code" should be put to rest. Here is someone sharing their experiment/code and the best that can be said is "gotta put to rest this phrase". Not that I am particularly interesting in chat bots, but what is disconcerting is the attitude of hurling negativity into a thread of discussion. Why not just skip it and not say anything and move on to a…
I just stated, that for me, yes that is only one data point, an improvement would be to leave the in xx LOCs out since it is meaningless.
Re: Building an IBM Watson-powered AI Chatbot in 50 lines of code
#7Well, it all depends on your definition of true intelligence...
Re: Building an IBM Watson-powered AI Chatbot in 50 lines of code
#8The bot described in this article is not a chatbot in that regard, it's a speech-to-text bot.
Re: Building an IBM Watson-powered AI Chatbot in 50 lines of code
#9Shameless plug: I'm working on a SDK to make the Watson speech services easier to use in web browsers. It's still got a few rough edges, but it's usable right now, and I'd love to hear feedback from other devs: https://github.com/watson-developer-cloud/speech-javascript-...
Update: here's a quick mashup I built with that SDK and the existing demo of the Watson Dialog service a little while back: https://speech-dialog.mybluemix.net/ (warning: audio auto-plays)
(I work at IBM, at least for the moment...)
Re: Building an IBM Watson-powered AI Chatbot in 50 lines of code
#10Speech to text: "so that's the one for this and if it is a very"
Thanks, Watson. Also, this is not a chatbot.