Earlier quoted context omitted.
I'm going to come out and say that this is no different than a person born without arms claiming that they're not disabled, that they're not damaged. To claim we shouldn't cure autism because doing so would "reject neuro-atypicality as a valid state of being" (a typical non-statement) is as absurd as saying we shouldn't grow people new limbs (assuming we had the capability) because it's a rejection of amputeeism as a…
> I'm going to come out and say that this is no different than a person born without arms claiming that they're not disabled, that they're not damaged. You might want to look at the social model of disability, because there are people who do say this. For example, wheelchair using disability rights campaigners have often said that their wheelchairs are not the problem, but the lack of ramps in shops and workplaces is…
This is not to say we shouldn't have wheelchair ramps. But let's be clear what the problem is, and what the ultimate aim should be, that is, the problem is the disability and the ultimate goal should be to repair the disability. To fix legs and spines, repair eyesight and ears, mend warped brains.