Live data from Hacker News

MATE Desktop Environment

mate-desktop.org

21–30 of 74 posts

Re: MATE Desktop Environment

#21

I'm curious now what stops people from using Linux on the desktop. There were significant issues a few years ago, but they now appear to be addressed. What are the problems with Linux on the desktop?

There are too many to list, but I personally believe all problems come down to a complete lack of focus on the user by the development communities in general.

Don't get me wrong: most of them, like KDE and Gnome, focus on some user, but that user is themselves, developers, open-source enthusiasts, etc.

All Linux desktop environments look really, really bad by default. Even Gnome 3, Kde 4 and Unity have terrible defaults, like icons I would be ashamed to draw on a high school art class (not that I would do better, I'm no designer, far from it). Also, there's no way to get a consistent looking desktop if you don't stick to the default applications. Having GTK and QT apps to look well together involves a lot of forum-reading and googling, and it's never 100% decent.

Usability only fits a very narrow category of users. Both Gnome and Unity have completely disregarded the Desktop community and shifted to either "tabletish" or "keyboard-driven" interfaces, something too many users simply don't feel at home with. KDE, while choosing to stay more on the classic "windowish" desktop, have been a complete unfocused mess of a project.

Then, for a third and last example, there's the lack of decent apps. All the commonly used apps for a Linux desktop user are usually "good enough" for what they're supposed to do, but none are really, really great. LibreOffice does the job, but it's a decade behind even MS Office. Linux ports of commercial apps are usually hideous and lacking features.

Bottomline: Linux desktop environments have been playing catch up with the commercial desktops since forever, but keep doing the same mistakes. Most distro's tried to copy the "App Store" model, for instance, but have done so terribly enough that I still find myself installing "Yumex" or "Synaptics" everytime I build a new machine.

There are, however, people going in the right direction. I've been watching projects like Deepin, Elementary OS and Solus - and I honestly think they're trying hard to do what bigger projects have been failing at. Maybe they'll stand up, maybe their ideas will be merged into the bigger boys, but it's good to know someone's actually trying.

Re: MATE Desktop Environment

#22

I'm curious now what stops people from using Linux on the desktop. There were significant issues a few years ago, but they now appear to be addressed. What are the problems with Linux on the desktop?

Lets see. Sound - it comes out of a random port sometimes with a sound source that dynamically appears (at a default of MAX volume in the mixer) that by the time you open the mixer app to turn it down is gone. Multiple screens - multiple hells. So what happens when you go to sleep? Screens can swap, sometimes they change relative position, sometimes they simply become inaccessible. Multiple screens with multiple desk…

Why can't you mount NFS shares over a statically configured ethernet port? And what do you mean by "it must be your primary port"? All of your other points sound reasonable and likely, but I'm curious what you meant by this one

Re: MATE Desktop Environment

#23
post #3

Since switching to GNOME 3 I can't use any other DE because none of them can emulate the workspace management of GNOME 3.

Ding ding ding

GNOME 3 got it right for me, one button/hand motion for everything, since starting it, I only moved between it and qtile because I like automatic tiling from time to time.

Re: MATE Desktop Environment

#26

I'm curious now what stops people from using Linux on the desktop. There were significant issues a few years ago, but they now appear to be addressed. What are the problems with Linux on the desktop?

I can't speak for people in general, but I've been using Ubuntu on the desktop/laptop for years now and it's a breeze. For me, the Year of Linux on the Desktop came a few years ago.

Everything pretty much works; occasionally I have to tweak some config file or install 32 bit libraries to get a game working, but that's about it. Video drivers work. Audio works. Wireless printers are autodetected smoothlessly. I can pretty much do with Linux what I used to do with Windows ten years ago, and more. I'm happy enough that I would recommend it to my mother if she bought a new computer and didn't require any strict MS Office compliance.

I'd say MS Office is a huge weapon in Microsoft's arsenal. Even though I'm pretty happy with my occasional use of LibreOffice, I guess for people that really need exchanging MS Office documents with other people and have them look identical in both computers, Linux is problematic.

Re: MATE Desktop Environment

#27
"The name “MATE”, pronounced Ma-Tay, comes from yerba maté, a species of holly native to subtropical South America. Its leaves contain caffeine and are used to make infusions and a beverage called mate."

Neat! And here I've been pronouncing it like the English word "mate".

Re: MATE Desktop Environment

#28
post #16

The last time I tried it, with Ubuntu Mate, I percieved it had more bugs than Xubuntu. Xubuntu comes with xfce. I find that xfce looks very similar to mate but runs more smoothly and it feels more polished. At least I don't remember seeing errors related to the UI with xfce, unlike the experience with mate.

I believe the Ubuntu Mate fork is pretty new and Ubuntu does modify gtk quite a bit. I've been using it on Arch and haven't really had any problems with it.

Re: MATE Desktop Environment

#29
post #4

hmmh without trying to talk negatively about it, why is this on front page? am I missing something here? What happened: people who were dissatisfied with gnome 3.x forked gnome 2 (a long time ago), created the Mate Desktop Environment, and that's pretty much it. somewhat ancient history and the site has nothing of particular interest to offer... (no revolutionary milestone or anything of that sort)

It seems as though posting an old or ongoing project's web site on HN at any time is considered normal. You aren't the only one who's confused by it. It would make a bit more sense if these posts linked to some kind of new release or announcement of interest from the project ("news").

Re: MATE Desktop Environment

#30

"The name “MATE”, pronounced Ma-Tay, comes from yerba maté, a species of holly native to subtropical South America. Its leaves contain caffeine and are used to make infusions and a beverage called mate." Neat! And here I've been pronouncing it like the English word "mate".

There's also "mate de coca", which has a different active ingredient than caffeine: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Coca_tea
Post reply on HN