A bit of an anecdote because the article mentions my town specifically - Tacoma: We put our house on the market Friday, April 8th, a bit below the "redfin estimate" - I saw it had gone live by 11am and we already had an interested party set up a viewing by 12pm. We showed the house 11 times by Monday morning and had 5 offers, some 12k above asking price. We accepted an offer by Tuesday (April 12). My head is still sp…
The entire Puget Sound is absolutely nuts right now - Friends put an offer on a 2BR1BA listed at 470, they were willing to escalate to 540, the house, now pending, went for 675 with three offers going above 600 and had a total of 20 written offers on it.
San Francisco Home Prices Fell for the First Time in Four Years in March
31–40 of 238 posts
Re: San Francisco Home Prices Fell for the First Time in Four Years in March
#32Earlier quoted context omitted.
As a foreigner, I don't understand this attitude. Why would you want all your wealth to be invested in a single leveraged asset that's also depreciating, requires your constant attention and ties you to a single locale?
A number of reasons: 1) You don't pay rent. Once you own the place free and clear, it's yours and you always have a home. 2) While the house depreciates, property may may still appreciate, especially if you live in a nice area, and even more so if you own the land beneath you. 3) There are tax benefits to owning your own house. 4) When you start out, it's usually not that much wealth, since you're taking a loan on it…
Re: San Francisco Home Prices Fell for the First Time in Four Years in March
#33As a Brooklyn resident (who rents), I hope this trend picks up steam and continues. Maybe I could be a homeowner some day after all!
As a foreigner, I don't understand this attitude. Why would you want all your wealth to be invested in a single leveraged asset that's also depreciating, requires your constant attention and ties you to a single locale?
Re: San Francisco Home Prices Fell for the First Time in Four Years in March
#34Earlier quoted context omitted.
As a foreigner, I don't understand this attitude. Why would you want all your wealth to be invested in a single leveraged asset that's also depreciating, requires your constant attention and ties you to a single locale?
A number of reasons: 1) You don't pay rent. Once you own the place free and clear, it's yours and you always have a home. 2) While the house depreciates, property may may still appreciate, especially if you live in a nice area, and even more so if you own the land beneath you. 3) There are tax benefits to owning your own house. 4) When you start out, it's usually not that much wealth, since you're taking a loan on it…
Assuming you can keep up with property taxes! :P Though I understand they can vary a lot from place to place.
Re: San Francisco Home Prices Fell for the First Time in Four Years in March
#35Re: San Francisco Home Prices Fell for the First Time in Four Years in March
#36Earlier quoted context omitted.
That's not exactly true. A lot of REIs are built on complex structures. The SF estate market might be fueling other investments. Once one starts to collapse it can have a domino effect. Basically if investors were expecting 10% annual return and you tell them this year might be 1-2% they'll take that money and move it elsewhere. Now you have to raise money or sell. When I used to live in downtown Miami there were hig…
> How can they take that money and move it somewhere? Most such investment contracts don't allow it. Am I missing something?
Re: San Francisco Home Prices Fell for the First Time in Four Years in March
#37Earlier quoted context omitted.
But you're not paying rent because you have hundreds of thousands of dollars locked up in tye house? The real question is, how much money would you have made if all that equity was in the stock market? Sometimes that can be more than what rent would be.
And sometimes the stock market crashes and takes everything with it. See: every ten years. At least with a house, even if the value goes down, you still have a home.
Re: San Francisco Home Prices Fell for the First Time in Four Years in March
#38Earlier quoted context omitted.
But you're not paying rent because you have hundreds of thousands of dollars locked up in tye house? The real question is, how much money would you have made if all that equity was in the stock market? Sometimes that can be more than what rent would be.
And sometimes the stock market crashes and takes everything with it. See: every ten years. At least with a house, even if the value goes down, you still have a home.
Re: San Francisco Home Prices Fell for the First Time in Four Years in March
#39Earlier quoted context omitted.
As a foreigner, I don't understand this attitude. Why would you want all your wealth to be invested in a single leveraged asset that's also depreciating, requires your constant attention and ties you to a single locale?
In addition to what reverend_gonzo said, there is the simple fact that rents (mostly) go up and mortgage payments don't.
Though if you have a long-term fixed-rate mortgage, you are probably OK.
Re: San Francisco Home Prices Fell for the First Time in Four Years in March
#40A bit of an anecdote because the article mentions my town specifically - Tacoma: We put our house on the market Friday, April 8th, a bit below the "redfin estimate" - I saw it had gone live by 11am and we already had an interested party set up a viewing by 12pm. We showed the house 11 times by Monday morning and had 5 offers, some 12k above asking price. We accepted an offer by Tuesday (April 12). My head is still sp…