Where is the actual evidence that strict historical preservation actually matters? The culturally important buildings tend to stay around whether they are "protected" or not...its really only at the margins where they do anything. And those margins tend to be pretty ridiculous. Seattle, for example, has upheld historical preservation status on buildings that were completely vacant and had no discernible written histo…
1. http://www.stlmag.com/arts/history/why-is-st-louis-destroyin...
Secondly, preservation review is about more than saving beautiful or historically important buildings. It's also about maintaining an urban form -- about preferencing the existing built environment over modern, car-centric, suburban-style developments. See this example:
2. https://nextstl.com/2015/01/do-the-math-qt/
This second point is tricky, because lots of people prefer the gas station to some old, simple, under-utilized structures.
But not the type of young people who want to work at a startup. Cities need to decide which kind of constituent they want to support.