Argh, the website is down...lol: "Error establishing a database connection"
Arq 5: Massively faster backup and restore for Mac and Windows
21–30 of 194 posts
Re: Arq 5: Massively faster backup and restore for Mac and Windows
#22Re: Arq 5: Massively faster backup and restore for Mac and Windows
#23$50/year and you have to provide your own storage? Can somebody explain to me how they are competitive, i.e. in comparison with Crashplan or Backblaze? edit: my bad, it's $50 for one time purchase, not a year.
Re: Arq 5: Massively faster backup and restore for Mac and Windows
#24Argh, the website is down...lol: "Error establishing a database connection"
It appears that there may be an issue with just their blog. The main site[0], and most of its links, works for me. [0] https://www.arqbackup.com/
Re: Arq 5: Massively faster backup and restore for Mac and Windows
#25$50/year and you have to provide your own storage? Can somebody explain to me how they are competitive, i.e. in comparison with Crashplan or Backblaze? edit: my bad, it's $50 for one time purchase, not a year.
Re: Arq 5: Massively faster backup and restore for Mac and Windows
#26How is this, from a technical point of view, more advanced than running rsync in a regular fashion (with hardlinks to keep cheap snapshots)? Just wondering about the technical aspects.
I had an older version that I upgraded to 4.x because they added support for uploading backups to Dropbox and I was already paying for a Dropbox pro account that had plenty of unused space. The ability to have versioned backups on various cloud services that don't support rsync is a big plus.
Re: Arq 5: Massively faster backup and restore for Mac and Windows
#27This being put aside I find their pricing a bit excessive in comparison to Backblaze for example.
Re: Arq 5: Massively faster backup and restore for Mac and Windows
#28Bah, I guess hosting a site at digitalocean isn't suitable for HN front page? Even WP super cache isn't saving me.
Re: Arq 5: Massively faster backup and restore for Mac and Windows
#29Bah, I guess hosting a site at digitalocean isn't suitable for HN front page? Even WP super cache isn't saving me.
They're pretty reputable for free speech and fighting for their customers too, so I trust them to a decent degree.