Live data from Hacker News

Parody O'Reilly book covers

imgur.com

21–30 of 34 posts

Re: Parody O'Reilly book covers

#21
While most of them are well done and funny in their way, they are not actually parodies of O'Reilly, they are parodies of developer attitudes using O'Reilly cover style (similar to meme generator images).

As an O'Reilly parody I would expect something like "Official paper version of an OSS manual you can download on the project page". The Stack Overflow cover is kind of like that.

Re: Parody O'Reilly book covers

#22
post #11
post #2

Needs "Essential Debugging with print statements"

There's nothing wrong about "debugging with print statements". If anything, if you're any good at it, it shows better knowledge of your program's behavior than blindly looking around in the stack on a debugger. In fact some of the biggest name programmers use just that -- including the very people who created . At best it's "hardcore" -- but not "bad" or anything like what's in the list. Here's some appeal to coding…

Thank you so much. I shall give my guilt complex its first day off for twenty years.

Re: Parody O'Reilly book covers

#23

The amount of questions I find on StackOverflow that could have been found with a simple Google search makes me think there really is a need to read effective Googling of error messages.

Often times stack overflow is the first google result for certain types of error messages, and the responses are generally useful for both fixing and understanding the problem.

Re: Parody O'Reilly book covers

#24

While most of them are well done and funny in their way, they are not actually parodies of O'Reilly, they are parodies of developer attitudes using O'Reilly cover style (similar to meme generator images). As an O'Reilly parody I would expect something like "Official paper version of an OSS manual you can download on the project page". The Stack Overflow cover is kind of like that.

par·o·dy ˈperədē/ noun

noun: parody; plural noun: parodies

1. an imitation of the style of a particular writer, artist, or genre with deliberate exaggeration for comic effect.

While splitting hairs can be fun, for all intents and purposes, I'd say this is a parody.

Re: Parody O'Reilly book covers

#26

While most of them are well done and funny in their way, they are not actually parodies of O'Reilly, they are parodies of developer attitudes using O'Reilly cover style (similar to meme generator images). As an O'Reilly parody I would expect something like "Official paper version of an OSS manual you can download on the project page". The Stack Overflow cover is kind of like that.

par·o·dy ˈperədē/ noun noun: parody; plural noun: parodies 1. an imitation of the style of a particular writer, artist, or genre with deliberate exaggeration for comic effect. While splitting hairs can be fun, for all intents and purposes, I'd say this is a parody.

Staying in that definition: My comment was that the "deliberate exaggeration" would be an exaggeration of the original, not of something else. For example, these meme generator images using movie pictures with Brad Pitt are also not parodies of Brad Pitt.

But yeah, I know that it is hair splitting. ;)

Re: Parody O'Reilly book covers

#29
post #15
post #2

Needs "Essential Debugging with print statements"

One of the best things of the interview book "Programmers at Work", was that all the greatest programmers used printf to debug.

The very first thing I do when starting a new project is putting the logging infrastructure in place. In production you don't want to spam stderr with each and every event. But if some operation fails the best way to understand why, is having a precise log of what chain of operations lead to this error.

Re: Parody O'Reilly book covers

#30

My favorite is the refrigerator magnet we have on our refrigerator. The refrigerator is where you put the refrigerator magnets, right? At least until the acid kicks in. http://i.imgur.com/dy0ii.png

This is great! Is there a website selling these?
Post reply on HN