ReachNow – BMW car sharing service in Seattle
41–50 of 62 posts
Re: ReachNow – BMW car sharing service in Seattle
#42Yet another reason to hate the San Francisco City Government -- they killed DriveNow SF by refusing to issue a (fairly common in most cities) bulk parking permit to BMW DriveNow (basically, all the cars would be bundled into one account and would pay parking tolls collectively -- either based on estimated usage or observed usage.)
As far as I can tell, they were asking for permission to park anywhere. Maybe there's a general-case problem there to solve for, but I'm not sure why "by-the-minute car rental for rich people" is a pressing problem for the city government to solve given the long list of other possible priorities.
The city has certainly been very supportive of car sharing in general; I've been a user in SF for more than a decade and the city has done a lot to push it forward.
Re: ReachNow – BMW car sharing service in Seattle
#43Why provide premium cars and then cover them in decidedly non-premium ReachNow stickers? I'm surprised this service is actually _by_ BMW. I understand wanting to use your cars for marketing, but at least do what zipcar did: don't place any stickers on the driver side so the driver feels like they're getting into a premium car.
BMW wouldn't want to cannibalize their primary source of revenue (selling luxury cars). One way to maintain the value of owning a BMW is to lower the status of their rental cars. Keeps owners happy and likely doesn't bother renters.
Re: ReachNow – BMW car sharing service in Seattle
#44Yet another reason to hate the San Francisco City Government -- they killed DriveNow SF by refusing to issue a (fairly common in most cities) bulk parking permit to BMW DriveNow (basically, all the cars would be bundled into one account and would pay parking tolls collectively -- either based on estimated usage or observed usage.)
Given that San Francisco's parking situation is not like most cities, what makes you think this was a mistake? As opposed to a reasonable choice you just happen to disagree with. As far as I can tell, they were asking for permission to park anywhere. Maybe there's a general-case problem there to solve for, but I'm not sure why "by-the-minute car rental for rich people" is a pressing problem for the city government to…
Re: ReachNow – BMW car sharing service in Seattle
#45Earlier quoted context omitted.
Given that San Francisco's parking situation is not like most cities, what makes you think this was a mistake? As opposed to a reasonable choice you just happen to disagree with. As far as I can tell, they were asking for permission to park anywhere. Maybe there's a general-case problem there to solve for, but I'm not sure why "by-the-minute car rental for rich people" is a pressing problem for the city government to…
Care sharing reduces demand for parking spaces and promote public transit which is generally considered a good thing.
http://www.sfgate.com/bayarea/article/Car-sharing-firms-gett...
Re: ReachNow – BMW car sharing service in Seattle
#46Re: ReachNow – BMW car sharing service in Seattle
#47The fleet management aspect of it is less interesting since I've seen quite a few companies operating in this space already.
Re: ReachNow – BMW car sharing service in Seattle
#48Re: ReachNow – BMW car sharing service in Seattle
#49$24/hour to drive and $18/hour to park, and that's promotional pricing. Though it does cap at $110/day, so if you use it for five hours you might as well have fun with it until the next day.
Re: ReachNow – BMW car sharing service in Seattle
#50Their service works really, really well I have to say. Almost every time there is a car parked close by, you rent them by the minute and park them anywhere. It is also much cheaper than Uber a cab or god forbid your own car.
[1]: http://drive-now.com