Live data from Hacker News

The Housing Market in San Francisco and Ideas to Fix It

blog.zactownsend.com

201–210 of 243 posts

Re: The Housing Market in San Francisco and Ideas to Fix It

#201

Earlier quoted context omitted.

> If you have a job that pays $100,000 and the taxes on your $250,000 house is $7,500 (3% property tax) and the tax quadruples to $30,000 in five years; why would you want the market fluctuations to be able to force an individual to leave their house? I shed exactly zero tears for someone whose $250k property quadruples in value to $1m in five years. Sell the house and dance with joy at your (untaxed!) $750k capital…

>I shed exactly zero tears for someone whose $250k property quadruples in value to $1m in five years. Sell the house and dance with joy at your (untaxed!) $750k capital gain. Ok, now where are they supposed to live? All the other properties cost just as much, so now they're forced to not only move out of the city, but now they have to quit their job too! How is this productive? You're penalizing someone for living in…

This is the problem with for lack of a better term, millennial analysis of historical decisions on current markets.

Prop 13 was put into place because the state and municipalities were raising taxes left and right without consideration of things like fixed income individuals being able to stay in their homes.

There was good and bad in the measure. Good - to a point - raising the need to add taxes above 50%+1 vote, the bad, it applied property tax issues to both commercial and residential properties equally.

It's much easier to set up a business entity to span generations and avoid taxes than it is a private home.

The measure also masked an issue of use. A single individual who bought a house for $500k would pay more in taxes than a family who bought a house in the same neighborhood for $350k, yet if the family has children in the schools, they are paying less in taxes and getting more out. Most property taxes have multiple assessments for schools.

It does need to be fixed, but the conversation so far has fixated on residential and ignored the commercial impacts of prop 13.

Re: The Housing Market in San Francisco and Ideas to Fix It

#202

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Why should we care more about grandparents than businesses?

Personally I would rather have no income tax or property tax - just very high sales tax. IMO, sales tax has a much larger tax base than any of the others - as income tax requires you to have a job/be a citizen; and property tax requires you to... own property. But that's not the reality we live in. Property taxes fluctuate too much in California - you might be paying everything you can toward your mortgage to decreas…

Sales tax is regressive and thus should not be the main source of tax revenue, we cannot push this burden onto the shoulders of people who already have the least.

Re: The Housing Market in San Francisco and Ideas to Fix It

#203
post #28

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/California_Proposition_13_%281... Good thoughts. You failed to mention Prop 13 which was put into place a long time ago and simply doesn't make sense anymore. It's at least part of the reason it is so affordable (in relative terms) for rich people to keep second homes here when they bought them years ago. We live in a building of 60 units where probably at least a third of those are abse…

I'm getting tired of defending prop 13. I'll take it as fact that their's empty potential rental units in San Francisco because it's so cheap to just keep the place.

I work in San Francisco. I have lived in San Francisco. I have had two generations of family live in that city. I don't like the city like a lot of you do. I try to avoid it on weekends.

I just haven't seen these empty potential rental units?

I now live in Marin County. I can guarantee I have never seen a empty house due to low property taxes.

My aunt used to live in Marin county. She was far from wealthy. She could only afford to stay here because her property taxes were reasonable. Actually, I would have let her stay with me for free, but she wanted her own house. A house she bought on a librarian's wage in the 50's. Yea--I know--you should let rediculious property taxes force her to move in with you to free up a home. A home she bought.

You will be her one day--I guarantee that--especially the average Programmer.

I was a kid, but before prop 13 property rates were going up every year--without a ceiling in sight. It was making Everyone scared. Beyond scared. Mad as Hell--by Howard Jarvis. I remember my father barely making those bi-yearly payments. I remember the fear on their faces. This was in the 70's, when San Francisco and Marin county were still basically middle class. Way before society decided these counties were magical?

When prop 13 passed. Their was a middle class sigh of relief.

Why can't you find a reasonable place to rent? San Francisco has always been a tight market. Yea, blame rent control. Marin has always been a tight market--no rent control, except in San Anselmo--detached mother-inlaw units are attached to federal poverty level in some way?

So--what's the problem? It's a unicorn of problems.

People are greedy. Building is very difficult. Zoning codes are ridid. Their are NIMBYs. Etc.

Again--people are greedy. Say there's a three bedroom two car garage house in Marin is paying $6000/yr in property taxes. The house has one working bathroom. There's no legal on street parking.

Do you really think that house will not be rented out. How do you think these people have the money they appear to have?

Even if your premise is right--do you really think rents would drop, if say 10 percent of housing opened up overnight? I really don't think some of you realize this is not the Bible Belt. There's not much morality here, except on Christmas, and maybe a few other holidays. People want their money. They are greedy. Get used to it.

I've seen greedy behavior forever, and there's always those that will look for something easy to blame it on. It's not prop 13! It's usually that CEO who needs to live in only the best enviornment? The beach, and mountians, and a low crime rate. Yea--that's where I want to set up shop? Let's the peons fight for housing.

Actually, the state would love it if this blame catches on.

The State of California will rob you blind.

That greedy behavior I have see in people, and even the state always sickened me.

(I wrote this off the cuff. There's bound to be errors. I really don't care to hear about petty errors. Actually, I don't come back to most posts, so fight among yourselfs. I can guarantee the state loves this blame on prop 13.)

Re: The Housing Market in San Francisco and Ideas to Fix It

#204

Earlier quoted context omitted.

...the houses would almost all be built for the very well off. The amount of houses you'd have to build before you started constructing truly affordable housing is immense. This is a common mistake. In reality, all added supply brings down price levels across the board.

I don't think you thought this all the way though. True, each new unit reduces the delta between supply and demand. But for prices to actually drop that delta would have to be reduced dramatically. Also the housing market has interesting striations. Reducing demand at the top prevents the demand for high-end from overflowing into mid and low end. This does little good if the majority of people moving to SF are middle…

> Reducing demand at the top prevents the demand for high-end from overflowing into mid and low end. This does little good if the majority of people moving to SF are middle class.

It does plenty of good because there will be fewer mid and low-end units occupied by high-income individuals and thus more available to mid and low income residents. This only has an effect up to the point where high-income supply catches up with demand, but we are a long ways off from that point.

Re: The Housing Market in San Francisco and Ideas to Fix It

#205

The only way to fix the housing market in San Francisco without destroying what people love about living there is to reduce the number of people living in San Francisco. And the most direct and effective way of doing that is to destroy the ridiculous bias against remote working. For all the innovative, intelligent, talented people in the Valley that we haven't yet figured out how to work together to build software wi…

I'm surprised and a little saddened that this is not higher up.

The root cause of the problem is that there are too many people wanting to move to San Fransisco because that's where the (tech) jobs are.

Spread out the jobs to spread out the people?

Re: The Housing Market in San Francisco and Ideas to Fix It

#207
Interesting article but I think the demand side also needs some more reexamination. It is very strange that SV mantra is "teams need to move there". Doubly silly since we're mostly talking about software companies. If you break that mentality some of the demand issues will go away.

It feels like a very dogmatic mantra "it just works better". VCs should try to reexamine and disrupt startup financing by not being clustered in one place (which is one of the top arguments for moving to SV other than talent pol being there which is kind of self fulfilling).

"Move to where your initial customers live" would be a decent counter-mantra. Make it a differentiator as a VC that you come to the startup and don't make them come to you.

Re: The Housing Market in San Francisco and Ideas to Fix It

#208
post #136
post #112

Earlier quoted context omitted.

It would indeed cause the pricing to drop, but just temporarily until all the new housing stock was filled. Basically, the author is suggesting that (within practical bounds) the demand for housing inside SF is unlimited. I think it's a fair assessment.

I really don't think so. If demand is effectively unlimited, then I highly doubt it is only unlimited at exactly the current housing prices. Some significant portion of the housing is not under rent control (most people I know don't live in rent controlled units) and some portion of the supposedly effectively unlimited demanders should be willing to pay more than the current prices.

Maybe they switch to alternatives (larger, further away) at around this price level. Other commentators have noted that you don't pay much less further away, just get much more house than you need. An increase in supply and subsequent drop in prices would be absorbed immediately given the other conditions (appears to be the claim).

Re: The Housing Market in San Francisco and Ideas to Fix It

#209
post #81

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Prop 13 is really great and really bad. My grandparents own a home in Livermore they've had from 1925. Livermore is now a very costly place to live in, and modern property taxes would make it impossible for them to live in a city they saw grow up around them. I do think Prop 13's protection should be eliminated for businesses - most definitely. If you're a landlord, perhaps it would make sense to allow up to 2 x Prop…

Then make prop 13 a 65+ only law that can only apply to your main residence.

That was my argument back when they passed the thing (17 year old me argument). You can do either of two things. Either limit property tax increases on a retired persons primary residence. Or allow retired people accept a tax lien in lieu of taxes.

Re: The Housing Market in San Francisco and Ideas to Fix It

#210
post #151
post #110

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Let's please test your intellectual honesty, shall we ? You are indeed correct that in our very modern era, the 2% ratchet under prop13 is less than what we see California real estate appreciating at. So would you indeed support rebates and/or clawbacks and/or negative property tax increases if California was to ever see sustained drops in valuation ? I own property in California as well as in other states and I can…

I don't think the people railing against prop 13 have ever lived in states where property tax rates are out of control to the point the people lose their homes... it's not pretty.

Do they lose their house in the sense of selling it at a massive profit? Or are the taxes rising irrespective of property prices?
Post reply on HN