Discovery of 1,000-year-old Viking site in Canada could rewrite history
1–10 of 93 posts
Re: Discovery of 1,000-year-old Viking site in Canada could rewrite history
#2Re: Discovery of 1,000-year-old Viking site in Canada could rewrite history
#3Should have a dedicated "archaeological news" version.
Re: Discovery of 1,000-year-old Viking site in Canada could rewrite history
#4Good, means we can get a season five of "Vikings"
Re: Discovery of 1,000-year-old Viking site in Canada could rewrite history
#5The reason why that is relevant is that the Viking discovery of America is of no significance if it didn't help European discovery in any way. If the knowledge was completely lost then it had not influence on history. A failed settlement in Canada which nobody ever learned about makes no difference whether it happened or not.
From what we know thus far it caused no technology transfer to the native americans and there is no proof it advanced european discovery in any way.
I am Norwegian, so I kind of have a vested interest in seeing something that gives the Viking discovery some sort of purpose.
Re: Discovery of 1,000-year-old Viking site in Canada could rewrite history
#6Good, means we can get a season five of "Vikings"
Ragnar dumps his Chinese girlfriend for Pocahontas. Rollo gets wind of these new adventures, immediately dumps his Parisian princess and swims to Tahiti for a life of Gauguin, further infuriating his inter-race-swingin bro. Floki giggles. Bjorn is even more bearded & pumped. There is still a diminishing side plot involving the British.
Re: Discovery of 1,000-year-old Viking site in Canada could rewrite history
#7Re: Discovery of 1,000-year-old Viking site in Canada could rewrite history
#8There is a chronology written by Fomenko et al. that questions most of the official history: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/New_Chronology_%28Fomenko%29
E: I wonder how they came to the conclusion that it's 1000 years old...
Re: Discovery of 1,000-year-old Viking site in Canada could rewrite history
#9Newfoundland is an island! I understand that there may be an implicit assumption that they most likely had to touch the continent before getting there but this isn't neither a fact (only a speculation) nor "much further into the continent".