Live data from Hacker News

Grunt 1.0.0 released

gruntjs.com

91–100 of 106 posts

Re: Grunt 1.0.0 released

#91

Hey! Core maintainer here. I see a lot of comments are basically saying our project is obsolete or sucks. That does not stop us from working on Grunt though. We are still seeing record download numbers, even with the 2 year old releases. This is why we felt it was important to keep releasing this software and supporting developers. For those who support and use Grunt - huge thank you! Pick up your free open-source co…

If I were to sum up the number of seconds your work saved (and still saves) me, I'd get an integer overflow.

May whatever supernatural entities you believe in be with you, man. I deeply, deeply thank you for your work.

Re: Grunt 1.0.0 released

#92
post #16

I am so pleased I abandoned grunt/gulp. Life is so much simpler with simple build commands. Now I just run whatever I need using npm run.

Same. It's really easy to do everything I need just using plain old CLI.

Re: Grunt 1.0.0 released

#93
post #36
post #16

I am so pleased I abandoned grunt/gulp. Life is so much simpler with simple build commands. Now I just run whatever I need using npm run.

For simple things, yes npm run is a better option. But with more and more Tasks i prefer cleaner and better readable solution. Depending on the kind of project and tasks i use grunt / gulp or webpack.

I like the idea of npm run for scripts. I just added something to automatically run tests for specific products at work.

Re: Grunt 1.0.0 released

#94
Well since this has seemly turned into a forum for build tool gripes, I'd like to note that no build tool is the best build tool. It simply comes down to what's maintainable for you and your team.

Re: Grunt 1.0.0 released

#95
post #31

Earlier quoted context omitted.

The problem with Webpack is that if you want to do something that's not straightforward[1] or covered in the dozen tutorials that are on the web, you're going to have a hard time. The docs are very basic and there are so many configuration params. If you want to do something that's not covered in tutorials or boilerplates, be prepared to spend a ridiculous amount of time reading Webpack PRs, issues and the codebase.…

Funny enough, if you look at the comments for pretty much the landing page of web pack you get the same sentiment http://webpack.github.io/docs/what-is-webpack.html

Yeah I agree with most of the sentiment but I let it by when you go to the github repo and check out contributor statistics. Pretty much it's just sokra doing everything and he does it in his free time last I heard. I think webpack is missing the support it needs in regards to how much it's actually getting used.

Re: Grunt 1.0.0 released

#96
post #40

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I never got what's so great about Grunt in the first place, and instead stuck to makefiles. Something like `cat src/*.js | uglify > build.js` would take me a lot more effort to do with Grunt (or Gulp).

If that's all you want to do (concat, minify, convert es6/sass), then by all means, I do agree make is the simpler albeit slightly less maintainable and non-cross-platform solution. I use make for my quick static sites too. But when you need more features like bundle splitting (app code and libraries live in separate files, for caching), cache-busting, lazy-loading, separate configs for production and development, et…

Sure, cross-platform (read: supports also Windows) is a big plus for grunt, gulp and the likes.

Re: Grunt 1.0.0 released

#97
post #81
post #74

Earlier quoted context omitted.

You admit most of the world had moved on from AMD, but don't see why advertising AMD support as a main feature - to the point it's mentioned in the sites description - would dissuade people? Being able to shim script tag libraries is mentioned in various places through the docs (and used to be even more prominent than it is now). I'm responding out of charity here: you made an angry response, were shown to have misre…

Mr. that was not my reply, and I didn't made a angry response... If you thought my characters conveyed angryness I apologize, I just critcized your points.

oops I didn't realise someone else chimed in.

Re your original post, the 'damned' and 'what are you talking about' and not reading my post charitably (that I was lying rather than just reading the site description) seemed rude. Thank you for apologising.

Re: Grunt 1.0.0 released

#98

Hey! Core maintainer here. I see a lot of comments are basically saying our project is obsolete or sucks. That does not stop us from working on Grunt though. We are still seeing record download numbers, even with the 2 year old releases. This is why we felt it was important to keep releasing this software and supporting developers. For those who support and use Grunt - huge thank you! Pick up your free open-source co…

Great work Grunt team, keep it up!

Re: Grunt 1.0.0 released

#99

Hey! Core maintainer here. I see a lot of comments are basically saying our project is obsolete or sucks. That does not stop us from working on Grunt though. We are still seeing record download numbers, even with the 2 year old releases. This is why we felt it was important to keep releasing this software and supporting developers. For those who support and use Grunt - huge thank you! Pick up your free open-source co…

don't listen to the haters, without grunt gulp would've never been possible. I still use grunt the majority of my legacy projects, and I appreciate grunts maintainability
Post reply on HN