Live data from Hacker News

Apricity OS: A Beautiful Arch Linux Distro

apricityos.com

51–60 of 123 posts

Re: Apricity OS: A Beautiful Arch Linux Distro

#51
[apricity-core]

SigLevel = Never

Server = http://apricityos.com/apricity-core/

This instructs the package manager (pacman) to load system packages over an unencrypted connection and disables all signature checks.

Source:

https://github.com/agajews/ApricityOS/blob/master/build/pacm...

https://wiki.archlinux.org/index.php/Pacman/Package_signing#...

Re: Apricity OS: A Beautiful Arch Linux Distro

#52
post #51

[apricity-core] SigLevel = Never Server = http://apricityos.com/apricity-core/ This instructs the package manager (pacman) to load system packages over an unencrypted connection and disables all signature checks. Source: https://github.com/agajews/ApricityOS/blob/master/build/pacm... https://wiki.archlinux.org/index.php/Pacman/Package_signing#...

[deleted]

Re: Apricity OS: A Beautiful Arch Linux Distro

#53
post #44

Earlier quoted context omitted.

That means I'll have to rewrite all my (Arch) packages for Nix in order for that to work, right? How does it deal with install scripts (inside upstream packages that you have no control over) that install stuff imperatively?

packages are namespaced in a directory for each package/version, like this: /nix/store/b6gvzjyb2pg0kjfwrjmg1vfhh54ad73z-firefox-33.1/ if a package is "installed" in an environment (it could be global, user local or temporary), its files are sym-linked in the "original" position (e.g. /usr/bin/firefox etc etc)

Small nitpick, they aren't symlinked to their original position, but instead to a "profile" (global for instance is in /run/current-system/sw, your local profile is $HOME/.nix-profile).

This has several consequences. It means binaries distributed with the expectation of libraries being in their original position (e.g. /usr/lib/libc.so) don't work as is. It also means scripts depending on the presence of /usr/bin/bash are broken (which happen far too often).

I love NixOS, but that is one of the biggest annoyance I have with the system.

Re: Apricity OS: A Beautiful Arch Linux Distro

#54

Are users reliant on Apricity for OS updates, or could it be connected to whatever update mechanism Arch uses in the event Apricity becomes obsolete?

https://github.com/agajews/ApricityOS/blob/master/build/pacm...

They use the default archlinux mirrors and add one for the extra packages

Re: Apricity OS: A Beautiful Arch Linux Distro

#55
post #36

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I guess it's oriented at people who isn't used to Linux and want a pretty OS to play with, or people too lazy to do it themselves :p

Those people are not going to be happy with Arch.

Yes they will. I installed vanilla arch many times but now I find it too time consuming and useless to do that by hand. Now when I want arch I install some arch based distro that at least have proper installer.

Re: Apricity OS: A Beautiful Arch Linux Distro

#56
post #49

Strange that they include Pushbullet, and advertise it so prominently, which is not a free service anymore and was the subject of a huge controversy when they cut features.

It's indeed strange and definitely against the spirit. There's an excellent open source project which does this and much more: https://play.google.com/store/apps/details?id=org.kde.kdecon...

Upvote for mentioning KDE Connect!

My favorite things about KDE Connect:

1) shared clipboard between mobile and PC

2) "send file to phone" - context menu in Dolphin / "send file to PC" in Android to quickly exchange single files

3) browse the whole Android file system (and copy/delete/edit files) directly from your file manager in Linux

Re: Apricity OS: A Beautiful Arch Linux Distro

#58
post #7

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Yes and this is great. I have felt Ubuntu to be way too bloated ( last time I checked it had many python scripts running by default on startup ) and Debian is hard to use on the desktop ( "stable" is too slow, "testing" is too unstable ). Arch will make a better foundation distro IMO.

I've found debian and ubuntu to be the best QA'd distros available. Followed by Fedora. After trying Arch and running into too many irritating bugs that I didn't have the patience to fix I gave up on it. Plus this didn't give me a good impression of the community's professionalism either: http://news.softpedia.com/news/Manjaro-Devs-Fix-Embarrassing...

The Manjaro community is separate from the Arch one. Typically, Arch has looked down on spin offs, and in particular on Manjaro because of the way they manage updates.

That said, I don't feel the idea of the Arch community revolves around professionalism; it is really an amateur thing, in the positive sense.

Re: Apricity OS: A Beautiful Arch Linux Distro

#59
post #49

Strange that they include Pushbullet, and advertise it so prominently, which is not a free service anymore and was the subject of a huge controversy when they cut features.

It's indeed strange and definitely against the spirit. There's an excellent open source project which does this and much more: https://play.google.com/store/apps/details?id=org.kde.kdecon...

KDEConnect pulls the whole KDE dependencies with it which I do not want while using Unity. That is the only thing that is stopping me from using it. Pushbullet works well for now.

Re: Apricity OS: A Beautiful Arch Linux Distro

#60
post #22

This sure looks nice. My problem with nice looking Linux is that I becomes too limited and I get forced into habits that I don't like. Now all I use is bspwm, no status bars or anything, a lot of times I miss having something good looking though. But I became happier when I just let it go, it's easy to go down that road of constant tweaking.

Every time I see a new tiling window manager I get a little thrill of excitement. Then I discover it's identical to every other one, including the one I already use. This isn't a complaint. I'm really happy with how pointless they make constant tweaking and customising
Post reply on HN