http://panamapapers.sueddeutsche.de/articles/56febff0a1bb8d3... >Generally speaking, owning an offshore company is not illegal in itself. In fact, establishing an offshore company can be seen as a logical step for a broad range of business transactions. However, a look through the Panama Papers very quickly reveals that concealing the identities of the true company owners was the primary aim in the vast majority of c…
Even if concealing your identity isn't illegal, you may be concealing it because you're involved in something shady. Like tax evasion.
Panama Papers - 2.6TB leak on offshore tax havens
21–30 of 89 posts
Re: Panama Papers - 2.6TB leak on offshore tax havens
#22I wonder who did the leak? I wonder if the law firm knows who did it and where he is now? My guess is some sys admin presumely at some central office (as this spans the whole company); I mean 2.6TB data - not so easy for an average lawyer to download to his laptop.
Re: Panama Papers - 2.6TB leak on offshore tax havens
#23I think less quality coverage, but interesting to watch the news spread through media here: - https://www.yahoo.com/news/putin-aides-among-world-leaders-e... - https://www.washingtonpost.com/investigations/associates-of-... - http://www.usatoday.com/ (prominent on front page) - http://time.com/4280200/panama-papers-vladimir-putin-russia-... - newyorktimes.com buried under politics http://www.nytimes.com/2016/04/04/us…
No leaks involving Americans (yet).
Re: Panama Papers - 2.6TB leak on offshore tax havens
#24Warning: If you click through to the article itself it will automatically start playing music. You might want to turn your volume down if you are in an environment where that would be inappropriate.
Re: Panama Papers - 2.6TB leak on offshore tax havens
#25Earlier quoted context omitted.
No leaks involving Americans (yet).
Don't expect to hear much on that front: https://www.craigmurray.org.uk/archives/2016/04/corporate-me...
https://twitter.com/ploechinger/status/716773530436825088
https://twitter.com/ploechinger/status/716763595820941312
Also, I hope journalists are asking the "accused" for their comments, and giving them time to respond, as journalistic best practice.
Re: Panama Papers - 2.6TB leak on offshore tax havens
#26Is it just me or is this expose surprisingly low on American citizens? Is this one of the times when conspiracy theory could be conspiracy fact? It feels like this is an extremely selective release.
Re: Panama Papers - 2.6TB leak on offshore tax havens
#27Is it just me or is this expose surprisingly low on American citizens? Is this one of the times when conspiracy theory could be conspiracy fact? It feels like this is an extremely selective release.
Re: Panama Papers - 2.6TB leak on offshore tax havens
#28Earlier quoted context omitted.
There are banking details, passports, drivers license info for thousands of people.. It'd be hugely irresponsible to publish all of that in a Torrent.. Redacted docs are accompanying all of the news reports.
- Passports: Not Secret. - Drivers Licenses: Also Not Secret. - Banking details of the people who have been ripping off the rest of the world...sorry if I fail to see the downside of dumping all of it :) EDIT: At the same time, I understand where you're coming from so thanks for the info mikeyouse!
I know right. But don't worry, sshykes, history repeats itself. :) There's always some great revolution that would wipe out corporate hypocrites off the face of this planet (I think ageing does that too). :-)
Re: Panama Papers - 2.6TB leak on offshore tax havens
#29My question is - what legal right do these journalists have to read this confidential information?
Re: Panama Papers - 2.6TB leak on offshore tax havens
#30Earlier quoted context omitted.
Even if concealing your identity isn't illegal, you may be concealing it because you're involved in something shady. Like tax evasion.
You wouldn't describe your position on cryptography and privacy in general as "moderate" by any chance?