Earlier quoted context omitted.
What lock do you have on your door? Something standard like this: http://goo.gl/cuIenh (Image of lock)? That can be opened easily in a number of seconds without damaging the lock with at least 2 well known techniques. Yet that is the lock installed on new doors on peoples homes. They don't care, people don't want/need actual security they just want to keep the idiot burglars out and be able to claim the value of thei…
Where do you live, that new homes have locks like those? Because here new houses pretty much require class C anti-burglar doors (which roughly means, they should be impenetrable in less than 10 minutes) - they have non-standard keys and complicated locking mechanisms, door-frame is locked into concrete etc. etc. Otherwise cost of your insurance will go through the roof.
Apple wants the FBI to reveal how it hacked the San Bernardino killer's iPhone
121–129 of 129 posts
Re: Apple wants the FBI to reveal how it hacked the San Bernardino killer's iPhone
#122I really find this whole thing hilarious. First, it's Apple sticking it to the FBI by making a stand for privacy and receiving public accolades doing so as a champion of privacy. The FBI is the bad guy trying to invade our privacy. Now, it's the FBI sending a giant "screw you" to Apple by not only letting them know they were able to hack into the phone without Apple's help but at the same time, making a mockery of Ap…
Re: Apple wants the FBI to reveal how it hacked the San Bernardino killer's iPhone
#123I really find this whole thing hilarious. First, it's Apple sticking it to the FBI by making a stand for privacy and receiving public accolades doing so as a champion of privacy. The FBI is the bad guy trying to invade our privacy. Now, it's the FBI sending a giant "screw you" to Apple by not only letting them know they were able to hack into the phone without Apple's help but at the same time, making a mockery of Ap…
This certainly isn't how it looks to me. The FBI comes off looking like complete fools to me. They said that they needed Apple's help to get into this phone, that there was no other way, and that Apple's refusal to help endangered national security, humanity, and the universe. Then they got called in front of Congress and schooled by a Congressman, one of the last places you'd expect to find anyone remotely technical…
They just hacked into an iPhone, something Apple has been claiming for a long time was impossible. Even Apple has no clue how they did it.
Incompetent they are not.
You're looking at political theater, that's it. But there's little incompetence flying around.
Re: Apple wants the FBI to reveal how it hacked the San Bernardino killer's iPhone
#124Earlier quoted context omitted.
I assume he means this would be the best strategy (if kept under wraps) for Apple's reputation; the public's interests notwithstanding. Regardless, grandstanding twice just looks foolish for everyone except the FBI.
You think this case makes the FBI look good? It took a month long media circus, made Apple look like the good guys, pissing off most of the tech community—all to unlock a single phone that likely has no useful data on it. If they had wanted to advertise their ability to unlock iPhones, they would have just done it, and done a press conference about how they unlocked it and got lots of good information. Instead, they…
Right now, I'd say they are looking pretty good: they hacked into the phone of a terrorist without breaking any laws.
Re: Apple wants the FBI to reveal how it hacked the San Bernardino killer's iPhone
#125Earlier quoted context omitted.
Where do you live, that new homes have locks like those? Because here new houses pretty much require class C anti-burglar doors (which roughly means, they should be impenetrable in less than 10 minutes) - they have non-standard keys and complicated locking mechanisms, door-frame is locked into concrete etc. etc. Otherwise cost of your insurance will go through the roof.
Where do you live such that those things are required to get a decent insurance rate? My insurance never mentioned a single one of those requirements.
Re: Apple wants the FBI to reveal how it hacked the San Bernardino killer's iPhone
#126Earlier quoted context omitted.
You think this case makes the FBI look good? It took a month long media circus, made Apple look like the good guys, pissing off most of the tech community—all to unlock a single phone that likely has no useful data on it. If they had wanted to advertise their ability to unlock iPhones, they would have just done it, and done a press conference about how they unlocked it and got lots of good information. Instead, they…
> You think this case makes the FBI look good? Right now, I'd say they are looking pretty good: they hacked into the phone of a terrorist without breaking any laws.
Re: Apple wants the FBI to reveal how it hacked the San Bernardino killer's iPhone
#127Ask these guys, not the feds: http://www.cellebrite.com/Pages/cellebrite-solution-for-lock... You are welcome Apple.
The San Bernadino phone was running iOS 9. (It's reasonable to assume that if there was a vulnerability in 8.x, Apple would want to have fixed it in 9.)
Re: Apple wants the FBI to reveal how it hacked the San Bernardino killer's iPhone
#128Earlier quoted context omitted.
> You think this case makes the FBI look good? Right now, I'd say they are looking pretty good: they hacked into the phone of a terrorist without breaking any laws.
If only it was really about just that phone, and didn't create a month long media circus power grab only to end it with "uh.... nevermind."
Re: Apple wants the FBI to reveal how it hacked the San Bernardino killer's iPhone
#129Earlier quoted context omitted.
If only it was really about just that phone, and didn't create a month long media circus power grab only to end it with "uh.... nevermind."
Of course it makes them look bad to anyone who thinks their looking good looks bad.