Wrestling With Inclusion at LambdaConf
degoes.net
Wrestling With Inclusion at LambdaConf
1–10 of 243 posts
Re: Wrestling With Inclusion at LambdaConf
#2This just in: preventing people to come to your conferences because of their beliefs is actually inadvisable and really, really difficult to make good on.
I don't agree with the guy's views either, but I wouldn't disinvite him just because he thinks that way.
Good on LambdaConf for letting him come anyway. Many of the quotes from this piece were shockingly powerful. I'm happy I took the time to read it.
Re: Wrestling With Inclusion at LambdaConf
#3[deleted]
Re: Wrestling With Inclusion at LambdaConf
#4So uh, who was this person?
Re: Wrestling With Inclusion at LambdaConf
#5So uh, who was this person?
Re: Wrestling With Inclusion at LambdaConf
#6For context, the project in question is https://github.com/urbit/urbit and the speaker is https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Curtis_Yarvin.
Re: Wrestling With Inclusion at LambdaConf
#7All this childish feelings based barbage has got to stop.
No, really. People have different opinions, and are allowed to have them, even if they hurt your feelings or you disagree. Since when did this thought crime bullshit take over? Orwell would never have thought that self policing, not Big Brother and his armed henchmen, were what would do in individual thought.
Re: Wrestling With Inclusion at LambdaConf
#8You'd think that someone could just come out and say exactly which of his views are so terrible, instead of pointing at his entire multiple-book-length blog and "wow just wow"ing.
Re: Wrestling With Inclusion at LambdaConf
#9What a well reasoned and thought through approach to making this decision and setting a precedent and standard - nice work.
Re: Wrestling With Inclusion at LambdaConf
#10Well done, John & Co. StrangeLoop caved to the threats of a vocal minority and, to my lights, made the wrong decision. Not only the wrong decision, but for the wrong reasons. Good for you for taking this principled -- and responsible -- stance.