Universities Are Becoming Billion-Dollar Hedge Funds with Schools Attached
11–20 of 267 posts
Re: Universities Are Becoming Billion-Dollar Hedge Funds with Schools Attached
#12Re: Universities Are Becoming Billion-Dollar Hedge Funds with Schools Attached
#13Is it just me or does the article fail to mention/estimate/discuss how much money the universities received _from_ hedge funds? It repeats over and over again how much the schools _paid_ in managers' fees, but if the return was several times that amount, then I guess I don't see the problem.
Re: Universities Are Becoming Billion-Dollar Hedge Funds with Schools Attached
#14I don't know how much this matters. Harvard has the richest endowment but still has less money then nine individuals. I am just waiting for say the Carlyle Group to go public like KKR or Blackstone to make HH funds boring and mainstream.
Re: Universities Are Becoming Billion-Dollar Hedge Funds with Schools Attached
#15Sidenote, and I may get down-voted heavily for saying this, because he's got plenty of "cred" on so many different fronts, but Noam Chomsky always struck me as a hypocrite when it came to his economic and political thinking for taking a pension supported by the $13 billion MIT endowment, which is surely generating money through many of the practices disparaged both in this article and Chomsky's own beliefs.
Besides, I doubt his pension is much more (if any) than is typical in his profession...
Re: Universities Are Becoming Billion-Dollar Hedge Funds with Schools Attached
#16Sidenote, and I may get down-voted heavily for saying this, because he's got plenty of "cred" on so many different fronts, but Noam Chomsky always struck me as a hypocrite when it came to his economic and political thinking for taking a pension supported by the $13 billion MIT endowment, which is surely generating money through many of the practices disparaged both in this article and Chomsky's own beliefs.
http://www.harvard.edu/president/news/2013/fossil-fuel-dives...
Re: Universities Are Becoming Billion-Dollar Hedge Funds with Schools Attached
#17Sidenote, and I may get down-voted heavily for saying this, because he's got plenty of "cred" on so many different fronts, but Noam Chomsky always struck me as a hypocrite when it came to his economic and political thinking for taking a pension supported by the $13 billion MIT endowment, which is surely generating money through many of the practices disparaged both in this article and Chomsky's own beliefs.
Re: Universities Are Becoming Billion-Dollar Hedge Funds with Schools Attached
#18Earlier quoted context omitted.
This is incredibly shortsighted. The point of an endowment is not to pay it off, the point is that the endowment persists indefinitely, and the interest / returns fund operations. If people wanted to contribute directly to a university, they can. Instead they're contributing to the endowment. Respect that choice. It's pathetic that universities have actually set up a sustainable source for funding scholarships etc in…
What if university endowments were used to fund research and implementation into ways to drive down the cost of education to zero?
Re: Universities Are Becoming Billion-Dollar Hedge Funds with Schools Attached
#19Sidenote, and I may get down-voted heavily for saying this, because he's got plenty of "cred" on so many different fronts, but Noam Chomsky always struck me as a hypocrite when it came to his economic and political thinking for taking a pension supported by the $13 billion MIT endowment, which is surely generating money through many of the practices disparaged both in this article and Chomsky's own beliefs.
Doing things on principle can be irrational.
Re: Universities Are Becoming Billion-Dollar Hedge Funds with Schools Attached
#20Sidenote, and I may get down-voted heavily for saying this, because he's got plenty of "cred" on so many different fronts, but Noam Chomsky always struck me as a hypocrite when it came to his economic and political thinking for taking a pension supported by the $13 billion MIT endowment, which is surely generating money through many of the practices disparaged both in this article and Chomsky's own beliefs.
So does that mean no one's allowed to criticize their employer? Or to encourage them to do better? Besides, I doubt his pension is much more (if any) than is typical in his profession...
If I've missed it, do point me to it and I'll recant.