Live data from Hacker News

Boom (YC W16) – Supersonic Passenger Airplanes

boom.aero

101–110 of 488 posts

Re: Boom (YC W16) – Supersonic Passenger Airplanes

#101
post #45
post #21

Fastest jet in the world still doesn't solve tarmac delays at JFK.

TEB + JATO + Boom = Profit? (TEB-LCY would actually be an interesting market for all-business-class STOL transatlantic)

That's Teterboro Airport + Jet Assisted Takeoff, and (Teterboro-London City Airport) for those like me who aren't in the know.

Re: Boom (YC W16) – Supersonic Passenger Airplanes

#104
post #62
post #21

Fastest jet in the world still doesn't solve tarmac delays at JFK.

Correct-- the real problem with air travel isn't the flight time but the terrible and inefficient process on the ground with security, customs, baggage claim. I'd much prefer a longer flight in a slower, less aerodynamic plane that was safer and roomier.

I wonder if there's a market for premium private air terminals, or even entire airports.

Re: Boom (YC W16) – Supersonic Passenger Airplanes

#106
post #14

As tangent, instead of focusing on NYC to London, a Mach 2.2 travel actually will make travel from Americas to Asia more comfortable. US to India and US to China routes benefit the most, and perhaps where people will be interested in paying top-dollar vs. Europe.

Does it talk about distance limitations at all? Sydney->everywhere could use this.

Re: Boom (YC W16) – Supersonic Passenger Airplanes

#107
post #35
post #3

Sorry but is "Boom" really a good name for an aircraft company? I get it's supersonic, but my first association was an exploding airplane.

"Bad" names can attract lots of attention. Perhaps they're more interested in turning heads than setting up the best possible brand connotations.

Brands? Who cares? Are they the cheapest, fastest etc? I don't care which characters constitute their name, nor which bitmap they've chosen for their current logo.

Re: Boom (YC W16) – Supersonic Passenger Airplanes

#110

Earlier quoted context omitted.

> single-day business trips between two major business centers which were otherwise a full day apart. Was the LON-NYC flight time the problem, though? I think that to go door-to-door right now you spend 50% of the time in the air and the other 50% on the ground. With this company, you'll be spending 3.5 hours in the air and 8 hours getting to and from airports and through security.

I would think that the people that can afford this have Uber helicopter service to/from the airport and all the line skipping extras paid for already. Not sure it is really 8 hours to and from airports/security.

Right. Selling at this price point they can easily focus on expensive extras. Special terminal with super fast security, then really quick transfers in both ends. If you could do a small airport experience in both ends (1h from hotel room to liftoff) they can charge what they want.
Post reply on HN