i think the pull-left pull-right code example is missing the pull classes. very cool, will give it a try
Thee "pull-left" and "pull-right" classes were added into v2.2 (in the Github repository) in addition to the similar "float-left" and "float-right" classes. These additions have been merged into the Master branch this afternoon. The example site is running on v2.1 which uses the float-left and float-right classes. Hope this helps.
Show HN: StringBean – 4K Featherweight Framework
11–14 of 14 posts
Re: Show HN: StringBean – 4K Featherweight Framework
#12i think the pull-left pull-right code example is missing the pull classes. very cool, will give it a try
Thee "pull-left" and "pull-right" classes were added into v2.2 (in the Github repository) in addition to the similar "float-left" and "float-right" classes. These additions have been merged into the Master branch this afternoon. The example site is running on v2.1 which uses the float-left and float-right classes. Hope this helps.
Re: Show HN: StringBean – 4K Featherweight Framework
#13The special casing for handling a three way split seems clunky at first glance. Why not use a 24-point system rather than 16?
Thank you for your comment/suggestion. Did think about a 24 unit approach, however we concluded it was not the way forward as the unit widths at 24-points would be ok at 4K, but at sub-4K they would be negligible, and the developer would need to work in multiples.
Re: Show HN: StringBean – 4K Featherweight Framework
#14You may also want to add that as a LICENSE file to your repo.