Qt 5.6.0 released
31–40 of 112 posts
Re: Qt 5.6.0 released
#32Qt is split into many sub-libraries so you only link to what you need. For example, one of my projects (pushpin.org) uses Qt but only links to the core and network libs; no GUI/X11/etc.
Re: Qt 5.6.0 released
#33I have never used Qt, and I feel like I have missed out. What concise sources would be recommended for someone with a Web development background, in order to start with Qt?
Re: Qt 5.6.0 released
#34I've used Qt many years ago (2007) and I liked the experience, but I had to move away from it because our company decided to go native on all fronts.. For internal tools/prototypes I was using JUCE for my UI needs, which is much smaller in scale that Qt, but it produced very slim executables, was fast and good enough for my needs (plus I loved the API). I still think this a great framework for small UIs and tools, es…
Re: Qt 5.6.0 released
#35Qt is easily the best cross-platform UI kit that I have used, especially in combination with Python, which turns it into THE rapid prototyping tool. For my research I used PyQt/PySide to build lots of UI components for controlling my lab equipment, visualizing my data and running code in an interactive way. While doing this kind of thing using a native toolkit (MFC, GTK) would have been possible, it would probably ha…
For a new project, do you recommend PyQt or PySide?
Re: Qt 5.6.0 released
#36Qt is easily the best cross-platform UI kit that I have used, especially in combination with Python, which turns it into THE rapid prototyping tool. For my research I used PyQt/PySide to build lots of UI components for controlling my lab equipment, visualizing my data and running code in an interactive way. While doing this kind of thing using a native toolkit (MFC, GTK) would have been possible, it would probably ha…
At the moment there are several community efforts but most of them are half baked and have little adoption :(
Re: Qt 5.6.0 released
#37Check http://qtweb.net/
Re: Qt 5.6.0 released
#38I've used Qt many years ago (2007) and I liked the experience, but I had to move away from it because our company decided to go native on all fronts.. For internal tools/prototypes I was using JUCE for my UI needs, which is much smaller in scale that Qt, but it produced very slim executables, was fast and good enough for my needs (plus I loved the API). I still think this a great framework for small UIs and tools, es…
Can I use the new fancy compiler stuff like Lambdas with QT? Does it still require a meta compiler?
Re: Qt 5.6.0 released
#39I've used Qt many years ago (2007) and I liked the experience, but I had to move away from it because our company decided to go native on all fronts.. For internal tools/prototypes I was using JUCE for my UI needs, which is much smaller in scale that Qt, but it produced very slim executables, was fast and good enough for my needs (plus I loved the API). I still think this a great framework for small UIs and tools, es…
Can I use the new fancy compiler stuff like Lambdas with QT? Does it still require a meta compiler?
In Qt 5.4 I had to add
CONFIG += c++11
to the .pro file.
I haven't used it, but it seems Qt 5.5 supports C++ 14.
Re: Qt 5.6.0 released
#40Qt is easily the best cross-platform UI kit that I have used, especially in combination with Python, which turns it into THE rapid prototyping tool. For my research I used PyQt/PySide to build lots of UI components for controlling my lab equipment, visualizing my data and running code in an interactive way. While doing this kind of thing using a native toolkit (MFC, GTK) would have been possible, it would probably ha…
For a new project, do you recommend PyQt or PySide?