Earlier quoted context omitted.
I'm not sure about others, but I also had a NSFW picture load up. Are the pictures random, some of which are NSFW? (Maybe in some places it is different, but even classical art can be considered NSFW in parts of the US.)
are we referring to "the three graces"? at what point along the spectrum of "abstract" does a boob become SFW? it's a rectangle with a rectangle inside of it, for fucks sake.
Responsive Pixel Art
81–90 of 132 posts
Re: Responsive Pixel Art
#82Re: Responsive Pixel Art
#83It breaks if you position the mouse to the top or the left edge of the canvas.
Re: Responsive Pixel Art
#84Re: Responsive Pixel Art
#85Re: Responsive Pixel Art
#86Re: Responsive Pixel Art
#87I am currently a bit blown away by the reaction to this. I finished this over a year ago but didn’t manage to make it public till now. I presented this at a meetup in Berlin yesterday and someone asked for an online version, which I postet to Twitter — then things escalated quickly.
So because a lot of people are asking: I am currently redoing my completely outdated homepage. The new one will include an in-depth explanation of what is actually happening there, what’s the idea behind it and how I want to apply this to actual web design to make resolution-independent work more easy and less restrictive for both designers and developers.
Until then I will try to answer some questions here …
Scalable Greetings Marcus
Re: Responsive Pixel Art
#88Re: Responsive Pixel Art
#89There appear to be a resize bug... for example with The Sphinx, if you go wide and short, the guy is pointing left with his arms, but if you go tall and skinny, the guy is pointing up with his arms...
Re: Responsive Pixel Art
#90>That's right, I'm tracking this side Do you mean you're tracking visits that hit "view page source"? Does that work? I can't find any info about that on Google.
I think he meant "site". It's just regular Google Analytics.