Earlier quoted context omitted.
>Compromised user accounts (not even the server! just users!) on a single website do not constitute a valuable target. That statement is just plain wrong. With over a billion Facebook users, surely some of them are high-value targets.
He's not wrong, you're just misunderstanding him. He's not saying there aren't "valuable" or "interesting" Facebook accounts. He's saying that there aren't enough Facebook accounts with immediate drop-in value to an existing and lucrative criminal enterprise to create a competitive market for Facebook bugs.
(Valuable != "immediate drop-in value")? So, he's saying the accounts aren't valuable, but they have value? The subtlety is lost on me...