Live data from Hacker News

If you're alive in 30 years you might be in 1000 years too

haakonsk.blogg.no

1–10 of 230 posts

Re: If you're alive in 30 years you might be in 1000 years too

#6
post #4

I don't mean to be a pessimist but this entire article boils down to describing Moore's law, and saying that medical research will advance quickly because it uses computers as well. Seems a little shoddy.

Well, to play devil's advocate for a moment… if actuaries did agree they wouldn't publicise it as an increased expectation of health is would benefit them financially. If actuaries expected people to live less time they'd be keen to increase rates and advertise it. If they seriously expected people to stop dying then the estimated value of life insurance policies would drop to zero.

Personally, I think it's more than a little unlikely that we're the last generation to know death.

Re: If you're alive in 30 years you might be in 1000 years too

#9
"The latest possible date a prediction can come true and still remain in the lifetime of the person making it is defined as The Maes-Garreau Point. The period equals to n-1 of the person’s life expectancy.

This suggests a law:

Maes-Garreau Law: Most favorable predictions about future technology will fall within the Maes-Garreau Point."

http://kk.org/thetechnium/the-maesgarreau/

Re: If you're alive in 30 years you might be in 1000 years too

#10
Probably off by a factor of 10. Very few people work in science doing research. The economy doesn't support enough people doing research to think we're going to make that kind of breakthrough within 30 years.

https://www.washingtonpost.com/national/health-science/us-pu...

Post reply on HN