Live data from Hacker News

Amazon Echo Dot

amazon.com

151–160 of 410 posts

Re: Amazon Echo Dot

#151
What's stopping people from accidentally ordering things with this thing? Could I go into somebody's house that has one of these devices setup and say "Alexa, order some breast clamps" ?

Re: Amazon Echo Dot

#153
post #48

when I saw Amazon 'Tap' I was hoping to see a star trek communicator[0] [0] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Communicator_(Star_Trek)

this should already be possible for a 3rd party to build with Alexa Voice Service. would be really neat to see.

https://developer.amazon.com/public/solutions/alexa/alexa-vo...

Re: Amazon Echo Dot

#154
I don't own one of these devices, yet I'm curious, can you "modify the device's name"? I mean, what if someone in the household has the name Alexa. No, not you Alexa, the other Alexa. Alexa do your homework. Alexa take out the garbage.

Re: Amazon Echo Dot

#155
Any reason Echoes couldn't communicate with each other? I envision my friend and I own an Echo. I could say "Alexa, call Joe". We could talk to each other through the Echo over the internet.

Re: Amazon Echo Dot

#156

Be forewarned - if I am invited into your home for any reason, and I see an Alexa device, I will vocally add a large shopping list of nonsense to your Amazon cart :)

"Alexa, order 12 gallons of milk"

55 gallon drum of personal lubricant, please and thank you. Wait, make that 2 drums.

Re: Amazon Echo Dot

#157
Any reason why Echoes couldn't communicate with other Echoes? My friend and I own Echoes. I could say "Alexa, call Joe" Joe and I could talk to each other through the Echoes over the internet.

Re: Amazon Echo Dot

#158

When did I turn from the enthusiastic kid who dreamed of audio-controlled personal assistants like this to a cranky old man who doesn't want anything remotely spy-possible in his house?

In hindsight it all sounds amazing and ignoring the spy-possibilties, it gets old fast. I don't use Siri, and I can do alot of this with it. But since I got the first Siri enabled device, I've used it mostly just for joking around and my daughter asks her hockey scores. That's the extent of it.

Re: Amazon Echo Dot

#159

Earlier quoted context omitted.

> I'm living proof you can enjoy movies without the audio. I am not looking to equate immersion with enjoyment, and by no means do I intend to disrespect the manner by which you enjoy a type of media. My apologies for coming off that way! When I refer to 'immersive media' I am referring to the 360-degree omnidirectional dispersion pattern of sounds and our similarly omnidirectional hearing of those sounds. This is 'i…

> 'immersive media' I am referring to the 360-degree omnidirectional dispersion pattern Then that is splitting hairs over a definition of immersion, and quite unrelated to how the word was used in my original comment. Had I instead said "fully engrossed," my point would still hold, and you would not have one. I understand you were being "super pedantic," but if you're going to do that, then you should be super precis…

[deleted]

Re: Amazon Echo Dot

#160

Somewhat related, but if I don't subscribe to any of the services listed, this is a pretty useless product for me. I don't listen to internet radio, I don't stream music, I don't order delivery, I don't use uber, there's already 10 million ways to check the weather, and my life isn't busy enough to need a voice-activated calendar. Is this the future of tech? Like do I need to have some kind of urban-go-getter lifesty…

What would you find useful? You seem upset that a product was designed for a user that is not you, but that doesn't mean it doesn't have a use. Subscribing to music streaming services, ordering delivery, using Uber; these aren't incredibly uncommon things just because you don't use them. It is rare for new and exciting technology to just pop out of nowhere. Almost all new products are reiterations of previous products in new and interesting packages, it's just up to you to decide if it's worth moving to.
Post reply on HN