Earlier quoted context omitted.
> They may be "do no evil" on privacy, but apple heavily pushes vendor lock in and basically does everything they can to keep you from being able to easily switch to a different vendor. This is often used as an argument against Apple, but having gone back and forth over the years, I just don't think it's true anymore. It certainly was a decade ago, but now I'm finding it hard to think of any issues I've had going fro…
Have you tried plugging an Android into a Mac?
Apple Letter on iPhone Security Draws Muted Tech Industry Response
201–204 of 204 posts
Re: Apple Letter on iPhone Security Draws Muted Tech Industry Response
#202Earlier quoted context omitted.
Have you tried plugging an Android into a Mac?
I haven't, no, but it'd be interesting to learn what the pain points are. Care to share?
Re: Apple Letter on iPhone Security Draws Muted Tech Industry Response
#203Earlier quoted context omitted.
This isn't the same thing at all.
Yes, it is. Apple's fight with the US is based on the fact they facilitate the encryption of user data so that even Apple doesn't see content. When the other titans don't have that feature, they have less of a stake in the argument at hand.
Re: Apple Letter on iPhone Security Draws Muted Tech Industry Response
#204Earlier quoted context omitted.
This isn't the same thing at all.
Would you expand on that? The feeling seems to be that these companies rely on access to user data in a way that Apple doesn't- that's true, isn't it?
Making money from targeted ads doesn't mean they think the FBI should be able to bypass device security via hardware and software vendors.
Basically: making money from data != believing that a right to encryption doesn't exist.