Earlier quoted context omitted.
Steam is the best of a bad bunch really - it's not perfect, but it's much fairer than other platforms. There's another article on HTG (linked from this one) that outlines the differences between Steam and Windows Store, and Steam scores quite highly. I was very surprised when some of my older games suddenly popped up as being available on Linux for no extra cost. When the Steam DRM works properly, it's pretty non-inv…
gog.com is the best option out there in my opinion. A strict no DRM stance, with sales on par with Steam's. You can download the installation binaries once and install offline as many times as you like with no extra effort, so there's no worries about losing your entire collection when a Russian script kiddy hijacks your Steam account to facilitate Counterstrike item scams and then Steam bans your account and says "w…
Windows Now Showing Full-Screen Ads
31–40 of 374 posts
Re: Windows Now Showing Full-Screen Ads
#32Seems like the only way people want to make money these days is through invasive advertising without the end-user's explicit consent. Granted the expectation of free software is driving most of this, but it starts a vicious cycle because those who get annoyed with them develop countermeasures, which the creator responds to with more aggressive ads, ad infinitum. It does start explaining some of the highly controversi…
Not sure how I'd feel if it started showing me blatant ads. I'd probably just turn it off. And if they annoy me too much, well, hello Mac or Linux.
I'm going to give Microsoft the benefit of the doubt here, they're still trying to figure out what "Windows as a Service" looks like. Note that Google has ads on its homepage and even Apple delivers ads via push notifications, breaking its own rules in this regard[2].
[1] http://betanews.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/09/Windows-10-lo... [2] https://marco.org/2014/12/01/app-store-rule-5-6
Re: Windows Now Showing Full-Screen Ads
#33Earlier quoted context omitted.
That doesn't necessarily hold true for FOSS, though.
Oh man, it's absolutely true for FOSS, unless you develop FOSS purely because of idealogical reasons, Richard Stallman-style. FOSS development can be turned into reputation and popularity, which can be turned into cash. It's much easier to get your startup off the ground (or find a good job or decent clients as a contractor, etc.) if you have 10,000 Twitter followers, because you write popular FOSS.
That doesn't make the software's user "the product" though. In your case the developer is making himself the product he tries to sell, not the users. This is really not comparable to advertisement and data collection.
Re: Windows Now Showing Full-Screen Ads
#34Re: Windows Now Showing Full-Screen Ads
#35I personally would have just assumed the ad to be yet another random lock screen image. Which I like for the most part.
Re: Windows Now Showing Full-Screen Ads
#36Earlier quoted context omitted.
According to this page[0] the item is $119. That's not free. [0]: http://www.microsoftstore.com/store/msusa/en_US/pdp/Windows-...
It was sold to the public as a "free" upgrade. "Free" in that context is what I am referring to.
Re: Windows Now Showing Full-Screen Ads
#37Earlier quoted context omitted.
That doesn't necessarily hold true for FOSS, though.
Oh man, it's absolutely true for FOSS, unless you develop FOSS purely because of idealogical reasons, Richard Stallman-style. FOSS development can be turned into reputation and popularity, which can be turned into cash. It's much easier to get your startup off the ground (or find a good job or decent clients as a contractor, etc.) if you have 10,000 Twitter followers, because you write popular FOSS.
Telling people not to trust anything they don't have to pay for seems a really obvious footgun for FOSS.