Live data from Hacker News

The Daily Mail Stole My Visualization Twice

flowingdata.com

11–20 of 145 posts

Re: The Daily Mail Stole My Visualization Twice

#11
post #3

[deleted]

He had, shall we say, "protections" in place to prevent his page from being embedded.

Daily Mail downloaded his source files, removed the protections, and then embedded their own iframe referencing the copied files with the protections removed.

I'd say that counts as stealing.

Re: The Daily Mail Stole My Visualization Twice

#12
post #3

[deleted]

Dodgy as hell though, if you do it without attribution. And you are sticking the true owner with the bandwidth costs.

Also: "So how did Daily Mail embed the visualization without the word “poop” popping up on an empty page? They downloaded all the files from my server on to their own server and deleted the snippet that brought up a poop alert. That way they didn't have to deal with those pesky safeguards I setup."

Re: The Daily Mail Stole My Visualization Twice

#15
I can't help but think that it would make sense for Mr. Yau to either (a) Change the server setting to emit the X-Frame-Options: DENY header or (b) monetize views on his graphic.

In general, you can't assume people won't deep-link your content, and that includes embedding. Taking steps to protect against or take advantage of traffic spikes is the responsibility of a content provider.

This, of course, wouldn't protect against DM just straight yanking all his assets and hosting them itself, which should be clearly immoral (and possibly illegal, depending on jurisdiction). But "framers gonna frame" is a fair thing to assume about the nature of web content, along the lines of " tags are cheap and if people see something funny on your site, they're gonna use 'em to share it."

Re: The Daily Mail Stole My Visualization Twice

#16
What I Would Do: Find out what law firm represented the Beastie Boys when they went after GoldiBlox.

Why I Would Do That: They were successful in their defense of the rights of the Beastie Boys and reached a settlement that included a public admission of guilt.

Long-Term Goal: To discourage such behavior through numerous examples of punishment using established rules.

Re: The Daily Mail Stole My Visualization Twice

#19
post #5

As soon as you searched you saw that many other people had written this kind of thing, and yet that hadn't done any good. What made you think this post would make any more difference than the previous ones you found? If you want to actually make a difference, talk to your solicitor. You might even get some money out of it.

That's a pretty silly thing to conclude.

I, for one, didn't know about any of this. So that's at least 1 more person aware of this practice because OP chose to write about it.

I imagine I'm not the only one.

Re: The Daily Mail Stole My Visualization Twice

#20

What I Would Do: Find out what law firm represented the Beastie Boys when they went after GoldiBlox. Why I Would Do That: They were successful in their defense of the rights of the Beastie Boys and reached a settlement that included a public admission of guilt. Long-Term Goal: To discourage such behavior through numerous examples of punishment using established rules.

Something tells me the Beastie Boys have a little more money to spend on lawyers than this guy does.

And that's a significant problem - most of the time organizations like the Daily Mail are ripping off small-time practitioners of data visualizations, comics, whatever... if it's something produced by a large company with lawyers you can bet they wouldn't touch it.

Post reply on HN