Live data from Hacker News

Paul Graham on Doing Things Right by Accident

themacro.com

31–40 of 95 posts

Re: Paul Graham on Doing Things Right by Accident

#31
post #21

Full-of-himself !

Right?? I was sitting here reading this and going I cant be the only one thinking this guy is some sort of a narcissist. And all the ridiculous sycophancy of poeple here trying to infer secret wisdom in his uninspiring answers only makes the whole thing even more bizarre.

Poverty is poverty only when you have no means to make your life better. Suffering form special snowflake syndrome is not poverty.

Re: Paul Graham on Doing Things Right by Accident

#32
post #22

I stopped reading this "treatise" when in the first paragraph Aaron spoke highly of the war criminal Donald Rumsfeld.

Well, Hitler was one of the worse individual the world has ever known, but if I had to research on charisma he would be among the people I would study.

Re: Paul Graham on Doing Things Right by Accident

#34
post #29
post #17

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I think this is a sentiment most people share, because most creative people only output—at most—a few masterworks in their lifetimes. I bet the people who are constantly pumping out works that, on their own, would be considered achievements—the Picassos and Frank Zappas and Stephen Kings of the world—have a pretty different view on how much of creating something good is inspiration vs. a schlepp.

Any famous writer I've ever read about has said that the amateur waits for inspiration, whereas the professional just sits down and gets to work. 12 months from now you won't be able to tell what you wrote while inspired and what while schlepping.

Yes, this is so important to communicate. I think "waiting for inspiration" is a bad approach and bad advice for anyone who want to do something professionally. Unless you are inspired 20-40 hours per week, only hobbyists have the luxury of waiting for inspiration.

Also, how will you ever improve in something if you only do it while inspired? And how will your inspired work be any good if you have no practice and experience to build upon?

Re: Paul Graham on Doing Things Right by Accident

#35
post #22

I stopped reading this "treatise" when in the first paragraph Aaron spoke highly of the war criminal Donald Rumsfeld.

Did you make that account just to dismiss the entire interview on misinterpreting a minor point and then be inflammatory about it?

That makes the provocateur comment of yours a bit ironic doesn't it.

Re: Paul Graham on Doing Things Right by Accident

#36
post #29

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Any famous writer I've ever read about has said that the amateur waits for inspiration, whereas the professional just sits down and gets to work. 12 months from now you won't be able to tell what you wrote while inspired and what while schlepping.

Yes, this is so important to communicate. I think "waiting for inspiration" is a bad approach and bad advice for anyone who want to do something professionally. Unless you are inspired 20-40 hours per week, only hobbyists have the luxury of waiting for inspiration. Also, how will you ever improve in something if you only do it while inspired? And how will your inspired work be any good if you have no practice and exp…

The main thing is that getting 4 masterpieces is extremely likely if you produce 10,000 works, and next to impossible if you produce only 4.

Re: Paul Graham on Doing Things Right by Accident

#37
post #2

That reminds me of this amazing talk called Why Greatness Cannot be Planned: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dXQPL9GooyI TLDV: Innovation is not driven by narrowly focused heroic effort. We'd be wiser and the outcomes would be better if instead we whole-heartedly embraced serendipitous discovery and playful creativity. We can potentially achieve more by following a non-objective yet still principled path, after throw…

[deleted]

Re: Paul Graham on Doing Things Right by Accident

#38
Off-topic but: Hooray for transcripts! I can see the benefits of being able to hear the pauses, tone, inflections, etc. but even leaving aside the deaf and hearing-impaired, there are so many advantages to having the text (it's searchable, you can read it while listening to music, it's quicker to read it than to listen to it).

Re: Paul Graham on Doing Things Right by Accident

#39
post #36

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Yes, this is so important to communicate. I think "waiting for inspiration" is a bad approach and bad advice for anyone who want to do something professionally. Unless you are inspired 20-40 hours per week, only hobbyists have the luxury of waiting for inspiration. Also, how will you ever improve in something if you only do it while inspired? And how will your inspired work be any good if you have no practice and exp…

The main thing is that getting 4 masterpieces is extremely likely if you produce 10,000 works, and next to impossible if you produce only 4.

Also, you (hopefully!) learned something while failing at those 9994 attempts that you fed into the 4.

Re: Paul Graham on Doing Things Right by Accident

#40

Off-topic but: Hooray for transcripts! I can see the benefits of being able to hear the pauses, tone, inflections, etc. but even leaving aside the deaf and hearing-impaired, there are so many advantages to having the text (it's searchable, you can read it while listening to music, it's quicker to read it than to listen to it).

Also much easier to understand for us with English as secondary languge.
Post reply on HN