Live data from Hacker News

TP-Link begins router firmware lockdown due to FCC proposed regulation

ml.ninux.org

1–10 of 77 posts

Re: TP-Link begins router firmware lockdown due to FCC proposed regulation

#4
post #2

Well crap... I have two C7s. IMO there might not be (or at least have been) a better mainstream router for the price.

It's expected other manufacturers will begin locking down their firmware. Ubiquiti, for example, already does.

Re: TP-Link begins router firmware lockdown due to FCC proposed regulation

#7
post #2

Well crap... I have two C7s. IMO there might not be (or at least have been) a better mainstream router for the price.

It's expected other manufacturers will begin locking down their firmware. Ubiquiti, for example, already does.

Out of curiosity, why would you want to reflash an Ubiquiti AP or router? They tend to be extremely feature rich, since they target enterprise and professional customers.

Re: TP-Link begins router firmware lockdown due to FCC proposed regulation

#9
I'd be hesitant to trust what comes from a CS rep regarding a manufacturer's policy regarding the interpretation/compliance of an FCC rule. TP-Link may have just decided to lock down their devices regardless.

I'm not saying this "report" isn't accurate... I'd just rather hear this from someone other than a random CS chat.

Re: TP-Link begins router firmware lockdown due to FCC proposed regulation

#10
https://libreplanet.org/wiki/Save_WiFi

The FCC publishes a 90-page document on an extremely technical subject and required any comments to be submitted within 7 weeks. It would take the average aficionado several weeks just to find out about it.

The real issue here is that government agencies like the FCC are willfully excluding all but the best organized (read: best funded) groups from participating. And just like with Net Neutrality, no matter how many comments are submitted by poor people, only when the rich (the companies) and the powerful (President Obama) say something do they even bother to listen.

Post reply on HN