Sundar Pichai Responds to Apple and the FBI Hacking Request
1–10 of 114 posts
Re: Sundar Pichai Responds to Apple and the FBI Hacking Request
#2There is full 'tweetstorm' that follows (this is 1/5), but I don't know how to link to that. Is it possible to link to a series of tweets?
2: https://twitter.com/sundarpichai/status/700104342720761856
3: https://twitter.com/sundarpichai/status/700104383762026496
4: https://twitter.com/sundarpichai/status/700104433183502336
5: https://twitter.com/sundarpichai/status/700104478360342528
Or we can read an article by The Verge: http://www.theverge.com/2016/2/17/11040266/google-ceo-sundar...
Another Edit, OT: Twitter is really, really, really hard to use. Stop worrying about onboarding new users, please make twitter usable for existing users.
Re: Sundar Pichai Responds to Apple and the FBI Hacking Request
#3Not quite as hard hitting as I would've hoped.
Gruber's take: http://daringfireball.net/linked/2016/02/17/pichai-apple-fbi
Re: Sundar Pichai Responds to Apple and the FBI Hacking Request
#4I'm not sure I understand the distinction he's making. G will comply with "valid legal orders"; what is not "valid" about the order Apple got? Why is granting law enforcement different from hacking devices, the point of which is to gain access to data?
Re: Sundar Pichai Responds to Apple and the FBI Hacking Request
#5I really wish the restrictions can be reduced or removed so @pmarca etc can tweet more on the companies of which they are the directors of. Same for the CEOs itself, and CEOs and other executives should be allowed to tweet at board of directors and vice versa.
Re: Sundar Pichai Responds to Apple and the FBI Hacking Request
#6Not quite as hard hitting as I would've hoped. Gruber's take: http://daringfireball.net/linked/2016/02/17/pichai-apple-fbi
Gruber's response is lukewarm too. Pot calling the kettle black.
Re: Sundar Pichai Responds to Apple and the FBI Hacking Request
#7Translation into English: our algorithms like your data very much, and we can't do anything with it if we can't read it. Shove your privacy needs where sun doesn't shine. We'll continue to give your data to the NSA without any judicial review.
Re: Sundar Pichai Responds to Apple and the FBI Hacking Request
#8Re: Sundar Pichai Responds to Apple and the FBI Hacking Request
#9There is full 'tweetstorm' that follows (this is 1/5), but I don't know how to link to that. Is it possible to link to a series of tweets? 2: https://twitter.com/sundarpichai/status/700104342720761856 3: https://twitter.com/sundarpichai/status/700104383762026496 4: https://twitter.com/sundarpichai/status/700104433183502336 5: https://twitter.com/sundarpichai/status/700104478360342528 Or we can read an article by The…
Storyify does a good job of making these readable:
https://storify.com/fuzzywah/sundar-pichai-responds-to-apple...
Re: Sundar Pichai Responds to Apple and the FBI Hacking Request
#10I'm not sure I understand the distinction he's making. G will comply with "valid legal orders"; what is not "valid" about the order Apple got? Why is granting law enforcement different from hacking devices, the point of which is to gain access to data?
The order has been issued properly, so it is valid, but Apple et al will claim that it violates their constitutional rights. So the order can be issued but not enforced. That;s the "illegal" aspect.