Are gravitational waves supposed to be that weak or is it because of the distance between us and those black holes? Do they lose power as they travel through space?
Physicists Detect Gravitational Waves, Proving Einstein Right
21–30 of 502 posts
Re: Physicists Detect Gravitational Waves, Proving Einstein Right
#22Re: Physicists Detect Gravitational Waves, Proving Einstein Right
#23> And then the ringing stopped as the two holes coalesced into a single black hole, a trapdoor in space with the equivalent mass of 62 suns. All in a fifth of a second, Earth time. Am I reading this correctly, that shortly after the detector came online we just happened to observe the exact moment a billion years ago that two black holes collided? Was that extremely coincidental? Or do these events happen all the tim…
The predictions for the LIGO detection rate are very poor. They're based on a sample of just a handful of binary pulsars observed in our Galaxy, which would produce NS-NS mergers. The BH-BH merger rate is almost totally unconstrained, although it is generally thought to be less than the NS-NS merger rate. So the fact that a BH-BH merger was the first detection, and the fact that it was detected so soon after the sens…
I guess you could count one looong wave as a series of one-time events/measurements, but it could as well be a loooong interference.
Re: Physicists Detect Gravitational Waves, Proving Einstein Right
#24Would it be possible to listen for information transmitted via gravitational waves? Would there be any benefit over radio?
Re: Physicists Detect Gravitational Waves, Proving Einstein Right
#25> And then the ringing stopped as the two holes coalesced into a single black hole, a trapdoor in space with the equivalent mass of 62 suns. All in a fifth of a second, Earth time. Am I reading this correctly, that shortly after the detector came online we just happened to observe the exact moment a billion years ago that two black holes collided? Was that extremely coincidental? Or do these events happen all the tim…
The predictions for the LIGO detection rate are very poor. They're based on a sample of just a handful of binary pulsars observed in our Galaxy, which would produce NS-NS mergers. The BH-BH merger rate is almost totally unconstrained, although it is generally thought to be less than the NS-NS merger rate. So the fact that a BH-BH merger was the first detection, and the fact that it was detected so soon after the sens…
Re: Physicists Detect Gravitational Waves, Proving Einstein Right
#26For someone like me who knows next to nothing about this, that video was extremely well produced and it explained everything i was wondering about.
Re: Physicists Detect Gravitational Waves, Proving Einstein Right
#27Would it be possible to listen for information transmitted via gravitational waves? Would there be any benefit over radio?
Re: Physicists Detect Gravitational Waves, Proving Einstein Right
#28> And then the ringing stopped as the two holes coalesced into a single black hole, a trapdoor in space with the equivalent mass of 62 suns. All in a fifth of a second, Earth time. Am I reading this correctly, that shortly after the detector came online we just happened to observe the exact moment a billion years ago that two black holes collided? Was that extremely coincidental? Or do these events happen all the tim…
Re: Physicists Detect Gravitational Waves, Proving Einstein Right
#29Sorry I am not vary knowledgeable on the topic.
Re: Physicists Detect Gravitational Waves, Proving Einstein Right
#30Are gravitational waves supposed to be that weak or is it because of the distance between us and those black holes? Do they lose power as they travel through space?
Distance. A billion light-years is a very long distance, and the inverse-square law applies.