Live data from Hacker News

Unsafe Lead Levels in Tap Water Not Limited to Flint

nytimes.com

21–30 of 146 posts

Re: Unsafe Lead Levels in Tap Water Not Limited to Flint

#21
post #5

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Drinking distilled water is not a good idea, which is basically what reverse osmosis gives you stripping out essential minerals. It's also an incredibly wasteful 4:1 process. Look into three stage filtering, that's all you need.

Carbon filtration will not remove dissolved solids (lead, heavy metals) without added ion-exchange resins. RO is generally the most effective broad spectrum treatment method for drinking water. The mineral issue is pretty much bunk, if the lack of trace minerals in your water is a concern you need to see a doctor. Food is your body's preferred source of minerals, you have to drink a lot to have much effect on your da…

You will notice the taste difference though.

Re: Unsafe Lead Levels in Tap Water Not Limited to Flint

#22
post #17

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Any results on the routine testing? Pointers?

http://www.agwt.org/node/169

I'm going to go out on a limb and say that "use a laboratory" is not the most helpful piece of advice ever :)

Re: Unsafe Lead Levels in Tap Water Not Limited to Flint

#23
post #3
post #2

Ancient Romans knew that lead water pipes were unhealthy and so they preferred terracotta pipes. It's hard to imagine why the U.S. ever had a single lead water pipe, let alone huge numbers of them. Updated with a reference for the downvoters: Sheets of lead were used to line Roman aqueducts (as was cement) and lead pipes to convey water. But lead also was known to be unwholesome and, for that reason, pipes made of cl…

> Ancient Romans knew that lead water pipes were unhealthy and so they preferred terracotta pipes. Do you have a source for this? At the same time, they used lead acetate to sweeten wine and food, which is way more dangerous. If they made the weaker connection between health and water pipes, they should have been able to connect health and this as well.

[deleted]

Re: Unsafe Lead Levels in Tap Water Not Limited to Flint

#24
If it's a wider problem than just Flint, why isn't it being presented as such by and large in the media and by politicians? Is it because that's where the political shenanigans were caught first, when will it get addressed as the more wide-spread problem it appears to be? Or is it more like an opportunist PR stunt [i.e. "we care a lot about..."] or the issue du jour which they'll abandon after they "address" Flint?

Re: Unsafe Lead Levels in Tap Water Not Limited to Flint

#25
post #15

If I travel to the US (Let's say Los Angeles, Seattle and New York) how do I know if the tap water is safe to drink? In the EU I normally just ask a local. In Germany it's safe to drink but in the Czech Republic you might be better off drinking bottled water (last time I checked was ~10 years ago, sorry if it's changed).

Default to not drinking from taps directly. I live in Seattle. We only use tap water after filtering with a Brita Filter for drinking and cooking. When we are outside home, we either bring filtered water with us or buy bottled water. At restaurants, if in doubt we ask if water is directly from tap. Since the flint lead news, I have been exploring how can I get my tap water tested on a routine.

Did you find anything acceptable, regarding the testing?

Re: Unsafe Lead Levels in Tap Water Not Limited to Flint

#26

If I travel to the US (Let's say Los Angeles, Seattle and New York) how do I know if the tap water is safe to drink? In the EU I normally just ask a local. In Germany it's safe to drink but in the Czech Republic you might be better off drinking bottled water (last time I checked was ~10 years ago, sorry if it's changed).

http://ofmpub.epa.gov/apex/safewater/f?p=136:102::::: :

It seems to be broken. Every city I enter gives me no results.

Re: Unsafe Lead Levels in Tap Water Not Limited to Flint

#27
post #21

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Carbon filtration will not remove dissolved solids (lead, heavy metals) without added ion-exchange resins. RO is generally the most effective broad spectrum treatment method for drinking water. The mineral issue is pretty much bunk, if the lack of trace minerals in your water is a concern you need to see a doctor. Food is your body's preferred source of minerals, you have to drink a lot to have much effect on your da…

You will notice the taste difference though.

You will for sure, I actually like it but not everyone does. You can remineralize and change the taste without too much trouble. I would avoid any other claims made for that process but it does usually improve the taste. Straight RO water is not great for coffee or tea as well.

Re: Unsafe Lead Levels in Tap Water Not Limited to Flint

#28
post #5

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Drinking distilled water is not a good idea, which is basically what reverse osmosis gives you stripping out essential minerals. It's also an incredibly wasteful 4:1 process. Look into three stage filtering, that's all you need.

I took a nutrition course given by a former top tennis pro. It was awesome. He recommended a reverse osmosis setup where you add alkalinity to the water. Celtic sea salt, lemon, apple cider vinegar, baking soda, active h2, etc,... not all at once necessarily but thats the protocol I eventually setup at my home.

What evidence was provided? Or was it just "I sported good, so do what I do."?

Re: Unsafe Lead Levels in Tap Water Not Limited to Flint

#29
post #7
post #3

Earlier quoted context omitted.

> Ancient Romans knew that lead water pipes were unhealthy and so they preferred terracotta pipes. Do you have a source for this? At the same time, they used lead acetate to sweeten wine and food, which is way more dangerous. If they made the weaker connection between health and water pipes, they should have been able to connect health and this as well.

Not only that, up to the late 20th century many products other than pipes contained lead. Lead paint, leaded gasoline, etc. The jury was out on lead in everyday use until quite recently. I doubt the poisonous nature of lead was well known when these cities were built.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lead_paint#History

Re: Unsafe Lead Levels in Tap Water Not Limited to Flint

#30
post #2

Ancient Romans knew that lead water pipes were unhealthy and so they preferred terracotta pipes. It's hard to imagine why the U.S. ever had a single lead water pipe, let alone huge numbers of them. Updated with a reference for the downvoters: Sheets of lead were used to line Roman aqueducts (as was cement) and lead pipes to convey water. But lead also was known to be unwholesome and, for that reason, pipes made of cl…

Doubtful: https://www.reddit.com/r/AskHistorians/comments/23o92d/on_co...

[deleted]
Post reply on HN